Investing№ 10Nasdaq: AVGO
Broadcom
Broadcom designs the custom AI chips and Ethernet networks the largest AI buyers run, and AI chip revenue reached $16.7B in the latest quarter, up 221%, against $179.2B of remaining performance obligations, about 25% due within 12 months.
Updated Fiscal year ends Sunday closest to 31 October31 min readPedrum Shokouhi
Strong moat
Research, not investment advice. Figures as of .
Key numbers
- Revenue$89.1B (calculated)TTM Aug 2026; up 49% on a year earlier [2][3]
- AI semiconductor revenue$16.7B (reported)Quarter to 2 Aug 2026; up 221% [4]
- Free cash flow$39.4B (calculated)TTM Aug 2026; 44% of revenue, before $8.5B of stock pay [2][3]
- Remaining performance obligations$179.2B (reported)2 Aug 2026; about 25% due within 12 months. The 10-Q counts committed amounts only and does not split the total between semiconductors and software or by termination right [3]
- Net debt$37.1B (calculated)2 Aug 2026; debt principal $61.1B less cash $24.0B [3]
- Top five end customers55% (reported)Share of Q3 revenue, company estimate; 50% over the nine months to 2 Aug 2026, about 40% a year earlier [3]
(reported)Reported in a filing (calculated)Calculated from reported figures (estimate)My estimate
The answer
- Broadcom designs the custom AI chips and Ethernet networking that the largest AI buyers deploy, and in the twelve months to August 2026 it turned $89.1B of revenue into $42.8B of operating income.23
- I value it at $261 a share, in a range of $95 to $431, and my base takes about 81% of management’s two-year AI revenue outlook, a company claim from a call transcript, with one down year in FY2030 (estimate).35
- At $326.08 the price is 25% above my base value and returns 7.5% a year on my cash flows against the 10.5% I require, so it pays for $227B of FY2028 AI revenue where my base has $167B, and my margin-of-safety price is $126 (estimate).505
Six questions, one line each
- Why
- It sells the custom AI chip and the Ethernet network inside the largest AI clusters, on top of a software franchise with an 80% segment margin before stock pay, and AI chip revenue went from $5.2B to $16.7B a quarter in a year (calculated).43 →
- The moat
- Switching costs in chips designed with each customer, scale in R&D and an installed software base; wide against rivals, thinner against the five customers who are 55% of revenue.36 →
- The advantage
- Scale among custom-silicon suppliers. $16.7B of AI revenue in a quarter against $2.2B for Marvell’s data-center line, but 19% of NVIDIA’s $89.0B, at a 61.3% semiconductor margin against NVIDIA’s 71.0% and AMD’s 31.3% (calculated).47839 →
- Management
- Hock Tan, 74, has been chief executive since 2006, first of Avago and then of Broadcom, and has bought $158B of companies; he owns 908,474 shares, sold about 1.54M from December 2023 to January 2026, and is paid in two stock awards whose hurdles sit far below today’s price and outlook.10111213 →
The business
Broadcom sells chips and infrastructure software. It designs the chips and makes almost none of them: TSMC made about 95% of the wafers that Broadcom’s contract manufacturers produced in FY2025.2 The software runs inside most of the Fortune 500.2 Fiscal years end on the Sunday nearest 31 October: FY2025 ended 2 November 2025. TTM on this page means the four quarters to 2 August 2026, because the fourth quarter reports in December.23
In the twelve months to 2 August 2026 revenue was $89.1B, up 49%. Semiconductor solutions brought in $59.4B at a 60.7% segment margin and infrastructure software $29.7B at 79.9% (calculated). Segment margins leave out stock pay, the amortization of acquired intangibles, restructuring and acquisition costs, which together cost $17.0B.2314
Revenue grew from $13.2B in FY2016 to $63.9B in FY2025, 19.1% a year. Five acquisitions, from Broadcom Corporation in 2016 to VMware in 2023, cost $158B (calculated) and are in those numbers; the table under Management lists them.1215161713
Net revenue and GAAP operating income
Fiscal years to Sunday closest to 31 October, US$ billions
- Revenue $63.9B in FY2025
- Operating income $25.5B
Show the numbers
| FY2016 | FY2017 | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | TTM Aug 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue (reported) | $13.2B | $17.6B | $20.8B | $22.6B | $23.9B | $27.4B | $33.2B | $35.8B | $51.6B | $63.9B | $89.1B |
| Operating income (reported) | −$0.41B | $2.4B | $5.1B | $3.4B | $4.0B | $8.5B | $14.2B | $16.2B | $13.5B | $25.5B | $42.8B |
What it sells
- Custom AI accelerators, called XPUs: chips designed with one customer around its own models. Google’s TPU is the oldest program. Management names Anthropic, OpenAI and Meta as large XPU customers, and Apple signed for custom silicon through 2031. Broadcom, Google and Anthropic expanded their collaboration so that Anthropic, from 2027, accesses about 3.5 gigawatts of TPU-based capacity through Broadcom; the 8-K says Anthropic’s use of it is ‘dependent on Anthropic’s continued commercial success’.6225
- AI networking: Ethernet switches, network cards and optics, sold to OEMs and system integrators and inside Broadcom’s own racks.2 Dell’Oro puts Ethernet at about two-thirds of AI back-end switch sales in the first quarter of 2026.23
- Other semiconductors: wireless, broadband, storage and industrial chips. They brought in $4.1B in the quarter to August, a fifth of segment revenue (calculated).34
- Infrastructure software: VMware Cloud Foundation, mainframe software, cybersecurity and Fibre Channel storage networking. Revenue was $8.75B in the quarter, including $3.47B of upfront license revenue.3
Where the money comes from
TTM Aug 2026, US$ billions. Bar length is revenue; the share is of the segments' total.
- Segment revenue, TTM Aug 2026 $89.1B
- Segment operating income $59.8B
Show the numbers
| Segment | Revenue | Share | Operating income | Margin | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semiconductor solutions (calculated) | $59.4B | 66.7% | $36.1B | 60.7% | +74.7% |
| Infrastructure software (calculated) | $29.7B | 33.3% | $23.7B | 79.9% | +14.5% |
The AI number
Broadcom’s AI revenue is not a line in any filing. The 10-K lists AI semiconductor solutions as custom accelerators, Ethernet switching and routing silicon, network cards, physical layer devices and optical components, plus racks and systems built on its accelerators, and the dollar figure appears only in the earnings releases.24 On the call, management said accelerators were 73% of Q3 AI revenue, a claim from a third-party transcript; the filings do not split accelerators, networking and racks.5
AI revenue by line
Q3 FY2026 against a year earlier, US$ billions. The only split management gave is on the call.
| Line | Q3 FY2026 | A year earlier | Growth | Gross margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XPU shipments (calculated) | $12.2B, 73% of AI revenue | about $3.5B | over 3.5x | Not disclosed; the 10-K says rack sales will likely compress gross margin |
| AI networking: switches, network cards and optics (calculated) | $4.5B, 27% | about $1.8B | over 2.5x | Not disclosed |
| AI semiconductor revenue (reported) | $16.7B | $5.2B | 3.2x | The semiconductor segment’s gross margin was about 67% (CFO) |
Calculated from the call: XPU shipments were 73% of Q3 AI revenue and up over 3.5x on the year, and AI networking up over 2.5x. The two lines add to about $5.3B a year earlier against the reported $5.2B. AI revenue also includes racks and systems built on Broadcom's XPUs, and the call does not say which line carries them. Revenue by customer is not disclosed, and Broadcom does not say what share of XPU revenue is Google's. Source Call transcript (Motley Fool); Q3 FY2026 release; 10-K FY2025 [5][4][2]. Figures calculated from reported data.
AI semiconductor revenue, quarter by quarter
US$ billions. Broadcom counts custom accelerators, AI networking and racks built on its accelerators. It reports the figure in earnings releases, not in its filings.
- Implied by the stated growth rate
- Reported in the release
- Guidance
Show the numbers
| Value | |
|---|---|
| Q1 FY2025 (calculated) | $4.1B |
| Q2 FY2025 (calculated) | $4.4B |
| Q3 FY2025 (calculated) | $5.2B |
| Q4 FY2025 (calculated) | $6.5B |
| Q1 FY2026 (reported) | $8.4B |
| Q2 FY2026 (reported) | $10.8B |
| Q3 FY2026 (reported) | $16.7B |
| Q4 FY2026, company guide (estimate) | $21.7B |
AI revenue was 47.6% of the TTM, $42.4B of $89.1B, and 56.4% of Q3 revenue. It was 80% of Q3 semiconductor segment revenue (calculated).43
Who pays
One semiconductor customer, a distributor, was 50% of Q3 revenue and 32% of FY2025 revenue. Broadcom does not name it.32 By end customer, the better measure, Broadcom believes its top five were about 55% of Q3 revenue and 50% over nine months, against about 40% a year earlier.3 On the call Tan counted six XPU customers, four of them ‘just simply going to be huge’.5
Customers now want more than chips. The 10-Q says top customers have asked Broadcom to lease its accelerators, to purchase full racks and lease them on, and to accept financing such as the AI XPV platform or deferred payment.3 The 10-K says what that does to the margin:
will likely increase our operating margin but compress or lower future gross margin
Gross margin was 75% in Q3, 210 basis points below Q2, which the CFO attributed to AI’s larger share of revenue, and she guided about 73% for Q4.45
Build-out or annuity
The case for an annuity is contracts. Remaining performance obligations were $179.2B at 2 August 2026, from $33.3B nine months earlier, and the 10-Q says they include a long-term custom AI accelerator contract signed in the quarter to 3 May.32 Apple’s agreements and Google’s supply assurance agreement run to 2031.622 Custom chips are redesigned each generation, so revenue recurs for as long as customers keep building.
The case for a build-out is who pays. The 10-Q says the XPV platform bridges the gap between the leading frontier AI labs’ cash flows and their upfront investment, and does not name them.3 On the call, management said the platform would enable more than 20 gigawatts for OpenAI and Anthropic, and Tan said the other four of the six XPU customers can fund themselves.5 The 10-Q also says the AI upturn ‘may not be sustainable’ and names a perceived AI spending bubble among the causes.3
I lean toward annuity for the software, and for AI revenue through FY2028, where supply is bought and contracts are signed. After that I lean toward a build-out, which is where the flat-to-down year in my base case sits.
Where
By shipment or delivery location, the United States was $16.5B of FY2025 revenue, China including Hong Kong $11.2B (17%), Singapore $10.8B and Taiwan $6.5B. These are delivery points, not end customers.2
The moat
I think Broadcom’s moat is switching costs, held up by scale in design and an installed software base. It is wide. Against rivals it is widening: the semiconductor segment margin rose from 48.5% to 61.3% as segment revenue tripled (calculated).173 Against customers it is narrowing, because five of them are 55% of revenue and each owns its chip’s architecture.3
An accelerator is designed with one customer around its models, its software and its racks. Moving to another supplier means redesigning the chip around the customer’s software, so a customer switches when it designs the next generation, not in the middle of one. The customer decides again at each generation. Counterpoint says Google dual-sources TPU v8 with MediaTek, Tan said Broadcom’s v8i is shipping ahead of MediaTek’s v8t, and the 10-Q lists customer-owned tooling as a scenario that could cut demand for Broadcom’s accelerators.2753
Customers run core systems on VMware and mainframe software, and Broadcom earns a 79.9% segment margin on it (calculated).314 I can test the software moat only at the edges. The one survey on churn was sponsored by a VMware support rival: of 269 users, nine in ten said licensing costs made them consider alternatives, and 48% had no plan to move assets to VMware Cloud Foundation.28 It measures intent, not exits, and Broadcom does not disclose renewals.
The last soft year for chips was FY2019. Semiconductor revenue fell 8.5% and segment profit fell 7.7%, and the margin held at 49% (calculated).17 FY2020 revenue fell 1%. Both years hit a semiconductor business less than a third the size of today’s (calculated). Today’s margins show scale and mix as much as moat: gross margin fell from 77% to 75% in the quarter and is guided lower.45
The moat, source by source
Evidence from the filings and releases, and the direction I read in it. The strongest sources come first.
| Source | Evidence | Direction |
|---|---|---|
| Co-design with the buyers who matter | A long term agreement with Google for custom TPUs with no end date stated, and a supply assurance agreement for networking and other components ‘through up to 2031’; Broadcom, Google and Anthropic expanded their collaboration so Anthropic accesses about 3.5 GW of TPU capacity through Broadcom from 2027; Apple’s agreements run through 2031622 | Widening in length; each chip generation is still re-decided |
| Scale in design | R&D of $11.8B in the TTM; 57% of about 33,000 employees work in R&D; about 19,000 patents23 | Widening |
| Operating leverage | Semiconductor segment margin 48.5% in FY2018, 57.6% in FY2025, 61.3% in the quarter to 2 Aug 2026, as segment revenue went from $19.1B to $36.9B to $59.4B in the TTM (calculated)172314 | Widening |
| Contracted revenue | Remaining performance obligations of $179.2B at 2 Aug 2026, from $33.3B at 2 Nov 2025; the 10-Q says they include a long-term custom AI accelerator contract32 | Widening |
| AI networking | Dell’Oro puts Ethernet at about two-thirds of AI back-end switch sales in Q1 2026; Broadcom’s switch silicon sits inside other vendors’ systems and Dell’Oro names no Broadcom share23 | Holding; no share figure |
| Software installed base | Segment operating margin of 79.9% in the TTM (calculated); the only outside evidence on churn is a survey sponsored by a VMware support rival, which measures intent31428 | Holding, under price pressure |
| Customer power | Top five end customers about 55% of Q3 revenue, from about 40% a year earlier; Counterpoint says Google dual-sources TPU v8 with MediaTek, while Tan said Broadcom’s v8i is shipping ahead of MediaTek’s v8t; the 10-Q names customer-owned tooling as a risk3275 | Narrowing |
Source 8-K Google, Anthropic; 8-K Apple; 10-K FY2025; 10-Q Q3 FY2026; 10-K FY2020; 10-Q Q3 FY2025; Dell'Oro AI networks; Counterpoint ASIC report; Register VMware survey; Call transcript (Motley Fool) [6][22][2][3][17][14][23][27][28][5]. Judgements are my estimates.
Evidence it is widening
Contracts. Obligations of $179.2B are 5.4 times the $33.3B of nine months earlier (calculated), and Apple’s agreements and Google’s supply assurance agreement run to 2031.32622
Operating leverage. The semiconductor segment margin rose from 48.5% in FY2018 to 61.3% in Q3 FY2026, with one dip, to 55.7% in FY2024 (calculated). Segment revenue was 3.1 times larger over the same span (calculated).171323
Supply. Management says it has secured the supply for its FY2027 and FY2028 outlook in leading-edge wafers, substrates and memory, is building a substrate fab in Singapore from FY2027, and is adding laser capacity. Purchase commitments are $126.8B, from $0.13B nine months ago.532 In a market short of memory, lasers and substrates, contracted supply is itself a barrier.
Evidence it is narrowing
Concentration. The top five end customers went from about 40% to about 55% of revenue in a year. The 10-Q says the loss of any one of them could have a material adverse effect, and the five average about 11% of revenue each (calculated).3
Second sources. Counterpoint expects Broadcom to hold about 60% of design-partner share of AI server compute ASICs in 2027 and Marvell 8%, a forecast from one research house.27 NVIDIA bought $2.0B of Marvell preferred stock and the two agreed to connect Marvell’s XPUs to NVIDIA’s ecosystem.7
Credit. A supplier that backstops its customers’ leases competes on its balance sheet as well as on silicon. Broadcom has given a backstop of up to about $29B on one tranche, and on 27 October it filed a second, of up to about $43B.349
The moat is wide against competitors and narrow against customers, and five customers are 55% of revenue.
The competitive advantage
Broadcom’s advantage is scale and speed in custom AI silicon. On different definitions, in each company’s latest reported quarter, Broadcom’s AI revenue was 7.7 times Marvell’s whole data-center revenue, 2.5 times AMD’s Data Center segment and 19% of NVIDIA’s Data Center revenue (calculated).4798
Broadcom against its listed rivals
Latest reported quarter for each, ending June to August 2026. Segment profit excludes stock pay and acquisition amortization in all three.
| Broadcom | NVIDIA | AMD | Marvell | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| What is measured (reported) | AI semiconductor revenue: custom accelerators, AI networking, and racks and systems built on them | Data Center: GPUs, CPUs, networking and systems | Data Center segment: EPYC CPUs and Instinct GPUs | Data center end market |
| Quarter (reported) | Q3 FY2026, to 2 Aug 2026 | Q2 FY2027, to 26 Jul 2026 | Q2 2026, to 27 Jun 2026 | Q2 FY2027, to 1 Aug 2026 |
| Revenue (reported) | $16.7B | $89.0B | $6.7B | $2.2B |
| Growth on the year (reported) | +221% | +117% | +107% | +46% |
| Broadcom’s AI revenue as a multiple (calculated) | 1.0x | 0.19x | 2.5x | 7.7x |
| Segment operating margin (calculated) | 61.3% for the whole semiconductor segment | 71.0% for Compute & Networking | 31.3% for Data Center | Not reported by end market |
| Who the buyers are (reported) | Six XPU customers named by management; top five end customers 55% of revenue | Hyperscalers 55% of Data Center revenue | Anthropic: up to 2 GW of Instinct GPUs announced | Custom XPUs; NVIDIA bought $2.0B of its preferred stock |
Quarters end up to a month apart. Broadcom's figure includes Ethernet switching, optics and racks, and the company does not split them from accelerators. AMD's segment includes server CPUs. Alphabet's, Amazon's and Meta's in-house design teams have no reported revenue, and MediaTek, a named second source on one TPU part, is not in the table. Source Q3 FY2026 release; 10-Q Q3 FY2026; NVIDIA 10-Q Q2 FY2027; AMD Q2 2026; Marvell 10-Q Q2 FY2027 [4][3][8][9][7]. Figures as reported.
The margins show where the pricing power sits. Broadcom’s semiconductor segment earned 61.3% in the quarter, NVIDIA’s Compute & Networking segment 71.0% and AMD’s Data Center segment 31.3% (calculated).389 Broadcom’s figure covers non-AI chips as well, AMD’s includes server CPUs, and all three leave out stock pay and the amortization of acquired intangibles.
The 10-K names no competitors. It says semiconductor rivals include integrated device makers, fabless companies and the in-house teams of large customers, and that some customers are entering Broadcom’s markets.2 Marvell, MediaTek, NVIDIA and AMD are the ones with numbers.
Where Broadcom wins
Broadcom wins where a buyer has one large, stable workload and wants to own its cost. Management’s claim is that an XPU performs as well or better on a customer’s own workloads at less than half the cost of a GPU. The claim comes from the call, in a third-party transcript, and no outsider has tested it.5 NVIDIA’s segment earns 71.0%, a margin that buyers with a stable workload have a reason to design around.8
It also wins in networking, where Ethernet took about two-thirds of AI back-end switch sales in the first quarter of 2026, with InfiniBand rebounding, and Broadcom’s switch silicon sits inside other vendors’ systems.23 And it wins on supply: it has contracted the wafers, substrates and memory for its own outlook, which a smaller design house cannot do.53
Where it loses
It loses where the workload changes faster than a chip can be designed, and where a buyer wants one supplier for chips, network and software. Marvell’s agreement with NVIDIA points at that second case.7 It also loses a customer’s next generation when the customer builds the tooling itself, which the 10-Q names as a risk.3
The five customers that are 55% of revenue each have the scale to design the chip themselves, and Google already works with MediaTek on TPU v8.3275
Management
Hock Tan has been chief executive since March 2006, first of Avago, which was renamed Broadcom after it bought Broadcom Corporation in 2016. He is 74. Before that he ran Integrated Circuit Systems, was vice president of finance at Commodore International, and worked at PepsiCo and General Motors. He joined Meta’s board in February 2024 and left it at Meta’s annual meeting on 27 May 2026, having told Meta in April that he would not stand again.6263 Management names Meta as an XPU customer. The proxy says Broadcom deals with entities where a director has relationships on arm’s-length terms; it does not link that statement to Meta and gives no amounts.212105
He beneficially owns 908,474 shares, under 1%, worth about $296M at the Q4 2026 close (calculated); a year earlier the figure was 1,844,746.1029 The Form 4 data I retrieved for Tan runs from November 2023 to May 2026. It shows about 1.54M shares sold from 14 December 2023 to 6 January 2026, about $356M at each day’s close (estimate), plus 855,500 given away; sales before November 2023 are not counted.11 None of the senior team has a written employment contract.2
The chairman sold more than Tan did. The listing of insider transactions from 25 March to 23 September 2026 shows Henry Samueli selling about 1.54M shares, about $559M at each day’s close (estimate), while 16.2M of his shares stand pledged for loans. Mark Brazeal sold about 83,000 shares, about $32M.3010
Who runs it
Executive officers and the chairman, from the 10-K, the 2026 proxy and the 8-Ks.
| Name | Role | Since | Owns, sells or holds | Paid on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hock E. Tan | President and chief executive; 74; left Meta’s board in May 2026 | 2006 | 908,474 shares, under 1%, about $296M (calculated); sold about 1.54M shares from 14 Dec 2023 to 6 Jan 2026, about $356M at each day’s close (estimate)1011 | Two stock awards: up to 10M shares on price hurdles of $82.50, $95.00 and $112.50, vesting 31 Oct 2027; 610,521 target shares on AI revenue over four quarters in FY2028 to FY2030103132 |
| Amie Thuener | Chief financial officer; 51 | 2026 | Plan adopted 2 Jul 2026 to sell half of net vested shares until 28 Sep 20273 | $700,000 salary, 100% target bonus, 50,000 RSUs and 50,000 PSUs on hire; previously Alphabet’s chief accounting officer33 |
| Charlie Kawwas | President, Semiconductor Solutions Group; 55 | 2022 | Chief sales officer 2015 to 2020, chief operating officer 2020 to 20222 | FY2025 total pay $2.1M10 |
| Mark Brazeal | Chief legal and corporate affairs officer; 57 | 2017 | Sold about 83,000 shares from 16 Jun to 10 Jul 2026, about $32M at each day’s close (estimate); the listing also shows Velaga selling about 38,000 shares ($14M) and Kawwas 10,000 ($3.5M) in April30 | FY2025 total pay $28.6M10 |
| Kirsten Spears | Chief financial officer, Dec 2020 to 12 Jun 2026; retired | 2020 | Consulting to 15 Mar 2027; equity continues to vest33 | FY2025 total pay $28.2M10 |
| Henry Samueli | Chairman; 71; co-founder of Broadcom Corporation | 2018 | 85.6M shares, 1.8%, of which 16.2M are pledged for loans on a development project; sold about 1.54M shares from 25 Mar to 23 Sep 2026, about $559M at each day’s close (estimate), reported as indirect holdings1030 | Director pay |
Source 10-K FY2025; Proxy 2026; 8-K CFO; 8-K Tan PSU 2025; 8-K Tan PSU 2022; Tan Forms 4; Insider Forms 4; 10-Q Q3 FY2026 [2][10][33][31][32][11][30][3]. Figures as reported.
Pay
Tan’s reported FY2025 pay was $205.3M, of which $202.4M was the target value of the September 2025 award; the award’s maximum grant-date value is $607M. He had no annual cash bonus for FY2025, because the 2023 award covers five years of pay. The CEO pay ratio was 543 to 1.10
Two awards drive his incentives, and both are set far below where Broadcom is now.
Two awards and how far each has already been cleared
Hock Tan's two stock awards, with the share price and the AI revenue today.
| Hurdles | Where things stand | Worth at $326.08 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 award, granted Oct 2022: up to 10,000,000 shares, one third at each hurdle, vesting 31 Oct 2027 if he stays1032 (calculated) | 20-day average close of $82.50, $95.00 and $112.50 | The lowest close in the past year was $293.41, 2.6 times the top hurdle; the proxy shows the award at its maximum101 | $3.3B |
| 2025 award, granted Sep 2025: 610,521 target shares, 0% to 300%, vesting at the end of FY20301031 (calculated) | AI revenue over any four consecutive quarters in FY2028 to FY2030: $60B pays nothing, $90B pays the target, $120B pays the maximum | The Q4 guide of $21.7B is $87B a year; management’s FY2027 outlook is $115B and FY2028 is $230B45 | Target $199M; maximum $597M |
The values are share counts times the Q4 2026 close. The 2025 award's pay is written in shares, so its dollar value moves with the stock. Source Proxy 2026; 8-K Tan PSU 2025; 8-K Tan PSU 2022; Nasdaq historical; Q3 FY2026 release; Call transcript (Motley Fool) [10][31][32][1][50][4][5]. Figures calculated from reported data.
The 2023 award’s top price hurdle is $112.50, about a third of the current price. The 2026 proxy shows the award at its maximum of 10 million shares, worth $3.3B at today’s price if he stays to 31 October 2027.1032 The 2025 award pays nothing at $60B of AI revenue over four quarters, the target at $90B and the maximum at $120B. When the board set it, it expected FY2025 AI revenue of about $20B.1031 The Q4 guide already runs at $87B a year, within 4% of the target, and the FY2028 outlook of $230B is almost twice the maximum hurdle (calculated).45
These awards tie his pay to the stock and to AI revenue. The 2023 award is shown at its maximum, and the 2025 award’s target is about where the Q4 guide already runs. His disclosed holding is $296M, against awards worth up to $3.9B at today’s price, so the awards shape his incentives more than his shares do (calculated).10
The pay rewards AI revenue and a higher share price. The 8-K sets the 2025 award’s goal on AI revenue alone, with no margin, cash or return test, so the backstops that help win revenue are not charged to him.31 His $296M of shares is under a tenth of awards worth up to $3.9B (calculated).10 Over a full cycle the deals have paid, with FY2025 software profit at 17.0% of the $121.9B they cost,132 but the last buybacks paid $338 a share, above my base value.3
Shareholders have pushed back. Votes for the pay proposal, as a share of votes for and against, were 61.7% in 2024 and 66.4% in 2026, against the 92% the proxy reports for 2025, and the compensation committee chair, Harry You, received 74.0% on the same basis in 2026 against 79.6% in 2024 (calculated).341035 After the September 2025 award the company contacted holders of 45% of shares and met holders of 38%. The proxy says those holders acknowledged the importance of Tan’s continued leadership, and that top holders showed overwhelming support for keeping him beyond FY2027.10
The board says it is engaged in CEO succession planning and names no successor. Tan’s award runs to the end of FY2030, when he would be 78 (calculated).10
The bench
The CFO changed on 12 June 2026. Kirsten Spears, CFO since December 2020, retired and consults to March 2027. Amie Thuener, Alphabet’s chief accounting officer from 2018 to 2026, joined in May.33 Charlie Kawwas runs semiconductors, 67% of revenue (calculated), and has been at Broadcom since 2015.23
The chairman, Henry Samueli, co-founded Broadcom Corporation. He owns 85.6M shares, and 16.2M of them are pledged to secure loans for a development project; the proxy puts the pledge at about 0.3% of shares outstanding.10 The lead independent director of eight years, Eddy Hartenstein, retired at the April 2026 meeting at 75, and the board shrank to eight.3610
Capital allocation
Tan buys mature software and cuts its costs. The cash goes to dividends and debt. The record is strong, and the newest decision, financing customers’ racks, has no record yet.
The capital allocation record
Large decisions since FY2016, what they cost and what they became.
| Decision | When | Cost | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadcom Corporation (calculated) | Feb 2016 | $35.7B in cash and shares12 | The core of today’s semiconductor segment, which earned $36.1B of segment profit in the TTM (calculated)314 |
| Brocade (reported) | Nov 2017 | $6.0B in cash15 | Fibre Channel storage networking, now inside software |
| CA (reported) | Nov 2018 | $18.8B in cash1617 | Software segment profit of $1.2B in FY2018 grew to $20.8B in FY2025 after four deals172 |
| Symantec Enterprise Security (reported) | Nov 2019 | $10.7B in cash17 | Security software, kept |
| VMware (calculated) | Nov 2023 | $86.3B: $53.4B in stock (544M shares), $30.8B in cash for shares and $2.1B for VMware’s term loan and equity awards13 | $12.4B of revenue in its first ten months; software segment margin 79.9% in the TTM (calculated)13314 |
| The four software deals together (calculated) | FY2018 to FY2024 | $121.9B (calculated) | FY2025 software segment profit was 17.0% of what they cost (calculated), and about 12% after 17% tax and a revenue-share of stock pay (estimate); it includes organic growth and cost cuts and leaves out $8.3B of VMware debt assumed132 |
| Buybacks (calculated) | FY2018 to Q3 FY2026 | $43.6B for 846M shares, an average $51.53 (calculated) | Worth $276B at $326.08 (calculated). In the nine months to Aug 2026 it paid an average $338 for 25M shares, above my base value231315 |
| Dividends (calculated) | FY2016 to FY2025 | $57.1B of dividends and distributions, $56.0B of it on common shares (calculated) | A fifteenth straight annual increase for FY2026, to $2.60 a share; 31% of TTM free cash flow (calculated)2243 |
| Stock pay (reported) | FY2016 to FY2025 | $25.7B of expense; RSUs vesting in FY2025 were worth $21.7B | Diluted shares rose 26.7% from 3.83B to 4.85B; from FY2018 the count is flat without the 544M issued for VMware (calculated)21315 |
| Debt paydown | Nov 2024 to Aug 2026 | Principal down $8.8B (calculated) | Principal fell from $69.8B to $61.1B; $2.9B was retired by tender in June 20262337 |
Source 10-K FY2016; 10-K FY2018; 10-K FY2019; 10-K FY2020; 10-K FY2024; 10-K FY2025; 10-Q Q3 FY2026; Proxy 2026; Q4 FY2025 release [12][15][16][17][13][2][3][10][24]. Figures as reported.
The software deals clear my 10.5% discount rate: $121.9B of consideration became $20.8B of segment profit in FY2025, 17.0% before stock pay and amortization and about 12% after 17% tax and a revenue-share of stock pay (calculated).213 From FY2016 to FY2025 Broadcom generated $130.9B of free cash flow, paid $57.1B in dividends and distributions, $56.0B of it on common shares, and $35.1B in program buybacks, and spent $68.1B in cash on acquisitions (calculated); stock paid for the rest of VMware.21315 The buybacks did not shrink the share count. Diluted shares were 4.31B in FY2018 and 4.85B in FY2025, and without the 544M issued for VMware the count is flat, so the buybacks offset stock pay (calculated).15213
Cash returned to shareholders
Fiscal years to Sunday closest to 31 October, US$ billions
- Buybacks $2.5B
- Dividends $11.1B
- Stock-based pay, as a level $7.6B
Show the numbers
| FY2016 | FY2017 | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buybacks (reported) | $0B | $0B | $7.3B | $5.4B | $0B | $0B | $7.0B | $5.8B | $7.2B | $2.5B |
| Dividends (reported) | $0.72B | $1.7B | $2.9B | $4.2B | $5.2B | $5.9B | $6.7B | $7.6B | $9.8B | $11.1B |
| Total returned (calculated) | $0.72B | $1.7B | $10.2B | $9.7B | $5.2B | $5.9B | $13.7B | $13.5B | $17.0B | $13.6B |
| Stock-based compensation (reported) | $0.68B | $0.92B | $1.2B | $2.2B | $2.0B | $1.7B | $1.5B | $2.2B | $5.7B | $7.6B |
The dividend grew from $0.41 a share in FY2017 to $2.36 in FY2025, 24.5% a year (calculated).216 The buybacks were made at low prices until this year: Broadcom paid an average of $64 a share in FY2023 and $107 in FY2024, and $338 in the nine months to August 2026, above my base value.2313
The newest habit is financing customers. In June 2026 Broadcom launched the XPV platform, gave a backstop of up to about $29B on the first tranche’s leases, and accepted that a customer may issue it up to $42B of convertible notes.3 I found no earlier customer financing of this kind in the filings, so there is no record to judge it by.
Broadcom returned $17.7B to shareholders in nine months and in the same period added a backstop of up to $29B for customers’ leases.3
Financials
Profit is growing faster than cash. Four things need watching: upfront software license revenue, contract assets, the tax rate and stock pay.
Gross margin was 68.9% in FY2023, 63.0% in FY2024, the first year with VMware, 67.8% in FY2025 and 68.8% in the TTM. Operating margin went from 45.2% to 26.1%, after $9.3B of acquisition amortization, then to 39.9% and 48.0%.1323
Margins
Fiscal years to Sunday closest to 31 October, share of revenue
- Gross 67.8%
- Operating 39.9%
- Free cash flow 42.1%
Show the numbers
| FY2016 | FY2017 | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | TTM Aug 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross margin (calculated) | 44.9% | 48.2% | 51.5% | 55.2% | 56.6% | 61.4% | 66.5% | 68.9% | 63.0% | 67.8% | 68.8% |
| Operating margin (calculated) | −3.1% | 13.4% | 24.6% | 15.2% | 16.8% | 31.0% | 42.8% | 45.2% | 26.1% | 39.9% | 48.0% |
| Free cash flow margin (calculated) | 20.3% | 31.1% | 39.5% | 41.0% | 48.6% | 48.5% | 49.1% | 49.2% | 37.6% | 42.1% | 44.2% |
Gross margin by line is not in the filings, and the CFO gave it on the call: about 67% for semiconductors and 94% for software in Q3, which reconcile to the reported 75% for the company. The split of the semiconductor margin between XPUs and networking is not disclosed, and the 10-K says rack sales will likely compress it. Each point of semiconductor gross margin in FY2028 is $1.9B of gross profit in my base.542
Gross margin by segment, and gross profit in my base
US$ billions. Q3 margins are the CFO's on the call; the base-case margins are my estimates.
| Revenue | Gross margin | Gross profit | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semiconductors, Q3 FY2026 (reported) | $20.8B | about 67% | n/a |
| Software, Q3 FY2026 (reported) | $8.8B | 94% | n/a |
| Company, non-GAAP, Q3 FY2026 (reported) | $29.6B | 75% | $22.2B |
| Semiconductors, FY2027 base (estimate) | $129.5B | 64% | $82.9B |
| Software, FY2027 base (estimate) | $32.4B | 94% | $30.4B |
| Company, FY2027 base (estimate) | $161.9B | 70% | $113.3B |
| Semiconductors, FY2028 base (estimate) | $185.3B | 62% | $114.9B |
| Software, FY2028 base (estimate) | $34.0B | 94% | $31.9B |
| Company, FY2028 base (estimate) | $219.3B | 67% | $146.8B |
The split of semiconductor gross margin between XPUs and networking is not disclosed. Each point of semiconductor gross margin in FY2028 is $1.9B of gross profit. The Q3 company margin of 75% reconciles: $20.8B at 67% and $8.8B at 94% give $22.2B of gross profit. The transcript's prepared remarks print 76% for semiconductors; the CFO corrected it to 67% in the Q&A, and 67% is the figure that reconciles. GAAP gross margin was 69%, after amortization. Source Call transcript (Motley Fool); Q3 FY2026 release [5][4]. Judgements are my estimates.
Earnings quality
Upfront license revenue. Broadcom recognized $7.8B of upfront license revenue in FY2025 and $7.2B in the first nine months of FY2026, $3.5B of it in the latest quarter, on contracts where customers cannot terminate.23 It arrives when a contract is signed, not evenly, so software revenue growth of 29% in the quarter overstates the recurring rate. Management cites annual recurring revenue growth of 15%, a claim from the call.5 Contract assets, revenue recognized ahead of invoices, rose to $11.9B from $8.9B in nine months.3
Tax. The effective tax rate was −1.7% in FY2025 and 5.4% in the TTM (calculated), helped by Singapore and Malaysia incentives worth about $2.7B in FY2025. The 10-K expects the global minimum tax to ‘materially increase’ the rate; the Malaysia tax holiday expires in FY2028 and the Singapore incentives through November 2030, and management guides a non-GAAP rate of about 16% for the fourth quarter. I keep the rate at 17% for ten years, and each point of tax rate costs about $3 a share of base value (estimate).235
Cash. Operating cash flow was $40.7B in the TTM against net income of $38.3B. An $11.0B rise in working capital held it down, and stock pay of $8.5B is a cost that I charge.23
From profit to cash
TTM to 2 August 2026, US$ billions.
| TTM | |
|---|---|
| GAAP operating income (calculated) | $42.8B |
| Add back amortization of acquired intangibles (calculated) | $8.0B |
| Operating income before that amortization, after stock pay (calculated) | $50.8B |
| Company’s non-GAAP operating income, which also adds back stock pay and restructuring (calculated) | $59.8B |
| Operating cash flow (calculated) | $40.7B |
| Capital expenditure (calculated) | $1.3B |
| Free cash flow, the company’s definition (calculated) | $39.4B |
| Stock-based compensation expense (calculated) | $8.5B |
| Owner FCF, TTM: free cash flow less stock pay (calculated) | $30.9B |
| Add back the $11.0B rise in working capital (calculated) | $41.9B |
| Less the extra tax from moving the TTM rate of 5.4% to 17% on $40.5B of pretax profit (calculated) | −$4.7B |
| Owner FCF before working capital, at 17% tax: the reverse DCF’s start (calculated) | $37.3B |
The rise in working capital is the change in receivables, inventory, payables, compensation accruals and other current items in the cash flow statements: $4.9B in FY2025, $10.0B in the nine months to Aug 2026, less $3.9B in the nine months to Aug 2025. RSUs that vested in the nine months to Aug 2026 were worth $19.9B at vesting prices, against $6.3B of expense. Source 10-K FY2025; 10-Q Q3 FY2026; Q3 FY2026 release [2][3][4]. Figures calculated from reported data.
What the balance sheet shows about the ramp
Broadcom, US$ billions unless stated.
| 2 Nov 2025 | 2 Aug 2026 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue in the latest quarter (reported) | $18.0B (Q4 FY2025) | $29.6B (Q3 FY2026) | +64% |
| Trade receivables (reported) | $7.1B | $13.7B | +92% |
| Days sales outstanding, on the latest quarter (calculated) | 36 | 42 | +6 days |
| Inventory (reported) | $2.3B | $4.5B | +99% |
| Contract assets, revenue recognized ahead of invoices (reported) | $8.9B | $11.9B | +33% |
| Accounts payable (reported) | $1.6B | $4.0B | +156% |
| Unconditional purchase commitments (reported) | $0.13B | $126.8B | $126.7B more |
One customer was 44% of net receivables at 2 Nov 2025, against 18% a year earlier; the 10-K does not say it is the distributor. Broadcom sold $4.0B of receivables without recourse in the nine months to Aug 2026, from $5.7B. Source 10-K FY2025; 10-Q Q3 FY2026 [2][3]. Figures as reported.
Stock pay. The expense understates the cost. RSUs that vested in FY2025 were worth $21.7B at vesting prices against $7.6B of expense, and $19.9B in the nine months to August 2026 against $6.3B.23 There are 165M unvested RSUs, worth $54B at today’s price against $18.2B of expense still to be recognized (calculated).3 RSUs granted in the nine months were valued at $333.44 each at grant, against $142.47 on average for those outstanding. My cases charge $11.3B in FY2027 and $13.2B in FY2028, against $8.5B in the TTM; keeping stock pay at the TTM’s 9.5% of revenue would cost $23 a share (estimate).3
Free cash flow, and what capital spending took
Fiscal years to Sunday closest to 31 October, US$ billions. The full column is operating cash flow.
- Free cash flow $26.9B in FY2025
- Capital spending $0.62B
Show the numbers
| FY2016 | FY2017 | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | TTM Aug 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow (reported) | $3.4B | $6.6B | $8.9B | $9.7B | $12.1B | $13.8B | $16.7B | $18.1B | $20.0B | $27.5B | $40.7B |
| Free cash flow (calculated) | $2.7B | $5.5B | $8.2B | $9.3B | $11.6B | $13.3B | $16.3B | $17.6B | $19.4B | $26.9B | $39.4B |
| Capital spending (reported) | $0.72B | $1.1B | $0.64B | $0.43B | $0.46B | $0.44B | $0.42B | $0.45B | $0.55B | $0.62B | $1.2B |
The balance sheet
Debt principal was $61.1B at 2 August 2026 against cash of $24.0B, so net debt was $37.1B: 0.62 times non-GAAP operating income, and GAAP operating income covered interest 13.7 times (calculated).34 Principal peaked at $69.8B at the end of FY2024 after VMware.2 In the nine months to August Broadcom paid $10.5B on debt obligations and borrowed $4.5B.3 Coupons run from 1.400% to 5.700%, and management puts the weighted average at 4% with 7.4 years to maturity. The maturity table shows $2.3B due in the rest of FY2026, nothing in FY2027 and $5.1B in FY2028.35 The $7.5B revolver and the $4.0B commercial paper program are undrawn.3 Goodwill of $97.8B is 52% of assets.3
Off the balance sheet, Broadcom has stepped into its customers’ financing:
Where Broadcom's balance sheet supports its customers
At 2 August 2026, from the 10-Q and the 2 September call; the second backstop is from an 8-K filed on 27 October.
| Item | Amount | What it is |
|---|---|---|
| Backstop of a customer’s rack leases (reported) | Up to about $29B | A financial partner buys AI racks and leases them to a customer for five years. On a default Broadcom pays the gap between 85% of the lease amount outstanding and what the racks fetch. Fair value ‘not material’; nothing paid3 |
| Second backstop, 8-K of 27 October (reported) | Up to about $43B once the racks are deployed | Financial partners take on part of certain agreements to buy AI racks, with the related leases to a customer. Broadcom gives residual value support to a new special purpose vehicle and pays the gap between 72.5% of the lease amount outstanding and what the racks fetch. The 8-K calls it low probability and does not say whether it sits inside the $29B or the XPV tranches49 |
| Convertible notes a customer may issue to Broadcom (reported) | Up to $42B; none issued | Only for the customer’s lease obligations. Anthropic’s S-1 shows a $42.0B agreement with Broadcom for the same purpose353 |
| AI XPV platform (reported) | More than 20 GW through 2028; first tranche $35B for more than 1 GW, June 2026 | Financial partners fund racks leased to frontier labs; Broadcom may give residual value guarantees. Management named Apollo and Blackstone; asked for the maximum exposure of later tranches, the CFO had ‘nothing to announce today’35 |
| The platform at the first tranche’s price (calculated) | About $700B for 20 GW | $35B times 20, an upper bound because the first tranche covers ‘more than’ 1 GW. Broadcom has not said it would back later tranches (calculated)3 |
| Unconditional purchase commitments (reported) | $126.8B: $52.7B in FY2027, $73.0B in FY2028 | Primarily inventory, from $0.13B in November 202532 |
| Remaining performance obligations (reported) | $179.2B, about 25% within 12 months | Committed amounts in multi-year contracts in both segments, including contracts where customers have no termination rights. The 10-Q does not split the total by segment or by termination right3 |
My base case deducts none of these. My bear case writes off $26.5B of supply and pays $12B under the first backstop. A 10% chance of paying the full $29B would cost about $0.59 a share, and the same chance on the second backstop, $43B, about $0.88. My cases do not include the second. Source 10-Q Q3 FY2026; 8-K Google, Anthropic; Call transcript (Motley Fool) [3][6][5]. Figures as reported.
Broadcom, ten fiscal years
Fiscal years end on the Sunday closest to 31 October; FY2018 and FY2024 had 53 weeks. Money in US dollars, billions. TTM is the four quarters to 2 August 2026. Per-share figures and share counts are adjusted for the 10-for-1 split of July 2024. Owner free cash flow is operating cash flow less capital expenditure less stock-based compensation expense.
| FY2016 | FY2017 | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | TTM Aug 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net revenue (reported) | $13.2B | $17.6B | $20.8B | $22.6B | $23.9B | $27.4B | $33.2B | $35.8B | $51.6B | $63.9B | $89.1B |
| Revenue growth (calculated) | – | 33.2% | 18.2% | 8.4% | 5.7% | 14.9% | 21.0% | 7.9% | 44.0% | 23.9% | – |
| Gross margin (GAAP) (reported) | $5.9B | $8.5B | $10.7B | $12.5B | $13.5B | $16.8B | $22.1B | $24.7B | $32.5B | $43.3B | $61.3B |
| Gross margin, share of revenue (calculated) | 44.9% | 48.2% | 51.5% | 55.2% | 56.6% | 61.4% | 66.5% | 68.9% | 63.0% | 67.8% | 68.8% |
| Operating income (GAAP) (reported) | −$0.41B | $2.4B | $5.1B | $3.4B | $4.0B | $8.5B | $14.2B | $16.2B | $13.5B | $25.5B | $42.8B |
| Operating margin (calculated) | −3.1% | 13.4% | 24.6% | 15.2% | 16.8% | 31.0% | 42.8% | 45.2% | 26.1% | 39.9% | 48.0% |
| Operating income before acquisition amortization (calculated) | $2.2B | $6.6B | $8.7B | $8.7B | $10.2B | $13.9B | $18.6B | $19.5B | $22.7B | $33.5B | $50.8B |
| Net income (reported) | −$1.9B | $1.8B | $12.6B | $2.7B | $3.0B | $6.7B | $11.5B | $14.1B | $5.9B | $23.1B | $38.3B |
| Diluted earnings per share (split-adjusted) (calculated) | −$0.49 | $0.40 | $2.84 | $0.64 | $0.63 | $1.50 | $2.65 | $3.30 | $1.23 | $4.77 | $7.84 |
| Operating cash flow (reported) | $3.4B | $6.6B | $8.9B | $9.7B | $12.1B | $13.8B | $16.7B | $18.1B | $20.0B | $27.5B | $40.7B |
| Capital expenditure (reported) | $0.72B | $1.1B | $0.64B | $0.43B | $0.46B | $0.44B | $0.42B | $0.45B | $0.55B | $0.62B | $1.2B |
| Free cash flow (calculated) | $2.7B | $5.5B | $8.2B | $9.3B | $11.6B | $13.3B | $16.3B | $17.6B | $19.4B | $26.9B | $39.4B |
| Free cash flow margin (calculated) | 20.3% | 31.1% | 39.5% | 41.0% | 48.6% | 48.5% | 49.1% | 49.2% | 37.6% | 42.1% | 44.2% |
| Stock-based compensation (reported) | $0.68B | $0.92B | $1.2B | $2.2B | $2.0B | $1.7B | $1.5B | $2.2B | $5.7B | $7.6B | $8.5B |
| Owner free cash flow (after stock-based compensation) (calculated) | $2.0B | $4.6B | $7.0B | $7.1B | $9.6B | $11.6B | $14.8B | $15.5B | $13.7B | $19.3B | $30.9B |
| Share repurchases under the repurchase program (reported) | $0B | $0B | $7.3B | $5.4B | $0B | $0B | $7.0B | $5.8B | $7.2B | $2.5B | $8.4B |
| Common dividends paid (reported) | $0.72B | $1.7B | $2.9B | $4.2B | $5.2B | $5.9B | $6.7B | $7.6B | $9.8B | $11.1B | $12.1B |
| Weighted diluted shares (split-adjusted) (calculated) | 3.83B | 4.21B | 4.31B | 4.19B | 4.21B | 4.29B | 4.23B | 4.27B | 4.78B | 4.85B | 4.89B |
| Net debt, carrying value (calculated) | $10.5B | $6.3B | $13.2B | $27.7B | $33.4B | $27.6B | $27.1B | $25.0B | $58.2B | $49.0B | $35.4B |
| Semiconductor solutions revenue (reported) | – | – | $19.1B | $17.4B | $17.3B | $20.4B | $25.8B | $28.2B | $30.1B | $36.9B | $59.4B |
| Infrastructure software revenue (reported) | – | – | $1.8B | $5.2B | $6.6B | $7.1B | $7.4B | $7.6B | $21.5B | $27.0B | $29.7B |
(reported)Reported in a filing (calculated)Calculated from reported figures (estimate)My estimate
Net income through FY2021 includes income attributable to preferred and non-controlling units. Diluted earnings per share is after that income. Source 10-K FY2025; 10-K FY2024; 10-K FY2023; 10-K FY2022; 10-K FY2021; 10-K FY2020; 10-K FY2019; 10-K FY2018; 10-Q Q3 FY2026; SEC companyfacts; 10-K FY2017; 10-K FY2016; 10-Q Q3 FY2025 [2][13][18][19][20][17][16][15][3][21][38][12][14]. Lines marked C are calculated from the reported lines above them.
Valuation
First, how this goes badly wrong
Before the numbers, I asked what would most likely ruin this, and worked back. Three things can. The labs may not be able to pay: two of the six custom-chip customers rely on Broadcom’s financing, and it has backstopped up to about $29B and filed a second of up to about $43B.349 Broadcom may have bought too much supply: it has $126.8B of purchase commitments, and my bear writes off $26.5B.3 A few buyers may pause: the top five are 55% of revenue, and the four largest cloud buyers spend 91% of their operating cash flow.345 The first two set my bear case.
An owner takes out less than the profit. Free cash flow was $39.4B, and after $8.5B of stock pay it is $30.9B, just over half of the $59.8B operating income the company reports (calculated).43 Standing still takes shares, not plants: RSUs that vested in nine months were worth $19.9B, against $6.3B of expense.3 The $30.9B is 1.9% of the $1.59T market value, or 2.3% on $37.3B with working capital steady and 17% tax (calculated).350
Some of it I cannot know. OpenAI is private and no filing I used shows its cash flow, and the FY2028 outlook is management’s claim, not updated each quarter.35 So I show a range, $95 to $431, not one number.
What the price implies
At $326.08 my base case returns 7.5% a year, below the 10.5% I require. The weighted value of my cases is $262 a share, and the skew at the price is −71% to my bear value and +32% to my bull value (estimate). I compare each return with my own 10.5% first and the 5.00% ten-year Treasury yield second.5039 Broadcom fell 5.5% on 30 October in a sector move: the Nasdaq Composite fell 2.9% and the PHLX Semiconductor index 7.2%.5052
Start with earnings. At $326.08, Broadcom trades at 18.7 times Nasdaq’s mean for FY2027 and about 10.9 times the FY2028 earnings that management says will exceed $30. Neither figure states its basis, and management does not say whether the $30 is before stock pay.405 My base earnings are $15.08 a share for FY2027 and $20.32 for FY2028 after stock pay, and $22.56 for FY2028 before it, on 4.887B shares (estimate). The outlook on time, at my margins, gives $28.82 before stock pay, so the claim needs more than my margins: on the company’s 4.94B shares, $30 needs an operating margin before stock pay of about 64% on $282B of revenue, below the 66% guided for Q4 (estimate).54
Ways to read the price
What $326.08 needs to be true. Multiples and returns are my estimates on the company's outlook and my cash flows.
| Reading | What the price needs |
|---|---|
| Price to the FY2027 consensus (reported) | 18.7 times Nasdaq’s mean of $17.46, from 14 estimates; the basis is not stated40 |
| Price to FY2028 earnings on the company’s outlook (estimate) | About 10.9 times: management says FY2028 earnings per share will exceed $30, and does not say on what basis5 |
| Price to my FY2028 earnings (estimate) | 16.0 times my $20.32 after stock pay, or 14.5 times $22.56 before stock pay, on 4.887B shares (estimate) |
| The outlook at my margins (estimate) | On the company’s FY2028 revenue at my base margins, earnings before stock pay are $28.82. Exceeding $30 on the company’s 4.94B shares needs an operating margin before stock pay of about 64%, below the 66% guided for Q4 (estimate) |
| Trailing earnings (calculated) | 42 times the TTM GAAP earnings of $7.84, and 33 times the non-GAAP $9.7634 |
| Owner free cash flow yield (calculated) | 1.9% on owner FCF, TTM, of $30.9B, and 2.3% on owner FCF before working capital, at 17% tax, of $37.3B, on a diluted market value of $1.59 trillion, against a 5.00% ten-year Treasury yield339 |
| Return on my cash flows at today’s price (calculated) | Bear −4.8%, base 7.5%, bull 14.4% a year, against the 10.5% I require and the 5.00% Treasury yield. The method is ten years of each case’s cash flow plus a year-ten value at 10.5%, bought at the price (estimate) |
| The outlook on time, then constant growth (calculated) | If FY2027 and FY2028 arrive as guided, at my base margins, the price needs owner free cash flow to grow 7.5% a year after that (estimate) |
Source Nasdaq consensus EPS; Call transcript (Motley Fool); 10-Q Q3 FY2026; Q3 FY2026 release; Nasdaq historical; Treasury yields [40][5][3][4][50][39]. Judgements are my estimates.
The price against peers on consensus earnings
Nasdaq consensus EPS means; closes in Q4 2026. Basis (GAAP or non-GAAP) is not stated for any of them.
| Close | Year ending | Price to EPS | Year ending | Price to EPS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Broadcom (calculated) | $326.08 | Oct 2027, 14 estimates | 18.7x | Oct 2028, 3 estimates | 11.6x |
| NVIDIA (calculated) | $204.64 | Jan 2028, 15 estimates | 13.0x | Jan 2029, 9 estimates | 9.4x |
| AMD (calculated) | $504.80 | Dec 2027, 19 estimates | 35.7x | Dec 2028, 3 estimates | 24.6x |
| Marvell (calculated) | $196.40 | Jan 2028, 14 estimates | 32.5x | Jan 2029, 5 estimates | 17.1x |
The consensus means were retrieved in Q4 2026, after the close; the provider keeps no snapshot for the close itself, and its three-estimate means for the later year are thin. The first year is the fiscal year ending nearest to calendar 2027. Fiscal years differ by up to three months. The NVIDIA page on this site uses a next-twelve-months blend. Source Nasdaq consensus EPS; Nasdaq consensus EPS, peers; Nasdaq closes, peers; Nasdaq historical [40][41][51][50]. Closes are for 30 October. A day earlier they were $345.00 for Broadcom[47], $213.66 for NVIDIA, $566.42 for AMD and $218.34 for Marvell[48]. When this page was first priced, a week before that, they were $321.68 for Broadcom[1], $210.96 for NVIDIA, $516.79 for AMD and $228.51 for Marvell[42]. Figures calculated from reported data.
Broadcom’s 18.7 times FY2027 earnings sits between NVIDIA’s 13.0 times and the 33 to 36 times of AMD and Marvell, on one source and one day.404151 The multiple does not separate my value from the price. The cash-flow path does.
The reverse DCF starts from $37.3B: the TTM’s owner free cash flow of $30.9B, which is free cash flow less stock pay, plus the $11.0B rise in working capital, less $4.7B of tax to move the TTM’s 5.4% rate to the 17% my cases use. I start before working capital, which the cases charge year by year, and after tax at 17%, the rate the cases use. That start is a yield of 2.3% on the diluted market value, against 1.9% on the $30.9B. I solve for one growth rate for ten years. The price needs 18.8% a year, to $208B in year ten (calculated). At my base-case margin of 41.2% that is about $505B of revenue, 5.7 times the TTM (estimate). At the reported 5.4% tax rate the start is $41.9B and the price needs 17.2% a year. Owner free cash flow grew 18.2% a year from FY2019 to FY2025, and my base case grows 13.8% a year from the $37.3B start.2316
What the price assumes
The owner free cash flow growth per year that today's price needs, next to what the business has done and my base case.
Show the numbers
| Rate | |
|---|---|
| What the price implies, years 1 to 10 (calculated) | 18.8% |
| Owner free cash flow growth, FY2019 to FY2025 (calculated) | 18.2% |
| My base case, years 1 to 10 (estimate) | 13.8% |
| My bull case, years 1 to 10 (estimate) | 19.4% |
Reverse DCF: the inputs
Solve the model for today's price instead of for value.
| Starting owner free cash flow, before working capital, at 17% tax (calculated) | $37.3B (the TTM's $30.9B, plus an $11.0B rise in working capital, less $4.7B of tax to move 5.4% to 17%) |
|---|---|
| Discount rate (estimate) | 10.5% |
| Growth after year 10 (estimate) | 3.0% |
| Net debt, about 1 Nov 2026 (estimate) | $26.5B |
| Diluted shares (reported) | 4.887B (Q3 FY2026) |
| Price (reported) | $326.08 (close, Q4 2026) |
| What the price implies, years 1 to 10 (calculated) | 18.8% |
Source Nasdaq historical; 10-K FY2025; 10-Q Q3 FY2026 [50][2][3]. Inputs from the filings and my model; the implied rate is calculated.
If the outlook arrives on time, the price needs owner free cash flow to grow only 7.5% a year after FY2028, so the debate is what comes after it.
The discount rate
I use 10.5%. The capital asset pricing model uses the 5.00% ten-year Treasury yield in Q4 2026 and Damodaran’s implied equity risk premium of 4.20% on 1 October 2026. It gives 10.1% on Broadcom’s ten-year beta of 1.21, 11.2% on the five-year beta of 1.48 and 12.0% on the three-year beta of 1.66 (calculated). The ten-year window includes years before VMware and before AI was close to half of revenue, so it understates the risk of the business I am valuing. The five- and three-year windows are mostly the AI run-up in one stock. I take 10.5%, a beta of 1.31, between the first two, and the base is $237 at 11.2% and $214 at 12.0% (estimate). The betas use month-end price returns without dividends.3943144 One point on the rate moves the base by 13% to 17%.
My base case at other rates
Value per share; discount rate down the side, growth after year ten across the top.
| Discount rate | 2.5% | 3.0% | 3.5% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9.5% (estimate) | $291 | $305 | $320 |
| 10.0% (estimate) | $270 | $281 | $294 |
| 10.5%, my rate (estimate) | $252 | $261 | $272 |
| 11.2%, CAPM with the five-year beta of 1.48 (estimate) | $230 | $237 | $246 |
| 12.0%, CAPM with the three-year beta of 1.66 (estimate) | $209 | $214 | $221 |
The price is $326.08. CAPM with the ten-year beta of 1.21 gives 10.1%; my base at 10.1% and 3.0% growth is $278. CAPM is the 5.00% ten-year Treasury yield in Q4 2026 plus the beta times Damodaran's 4.20% implied premium of 1 October 2026. Source Treasury yields; Damodaran ERP; Nasdaq historical; FRED SP500 [39][43][50][44]. Judgements are my estimates.
Three cases
I build each case from the segments down: AI, other semiconductor and software revenue, a segment margin for each, stock pay, a 17% tax rate on the profit after stock pay, capital spending of 2% to 3% of revenue against depreciation of 0.8%, and working capital at 20% of each added revenue dollar (calculated).23 The 17% is the rate Singapore applies without its incentives. Stock pay is a cost, as under GAAP. The amortization of acquired intangibles is non-cash and left out. The working capital build was 21% to 40% of added revenue in the filings, depending on the measure: $10.0B on the $46B rise in annualized quarterly revenue since November 2025, $11.0B on the $29.2B rise in TTM revenue, or $10.0B on the $25.2B rise in nine-month revenue. I use 20%, the low end, charge it only when revenue grows, and never release it when revenue falls (calculated).23
Three cases
Fiscal years FY2027 to FY2036, valued at the start of FY2027; free cash flow is after stock pay.
| Bear | Base | Bull | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI semiconductor revenue, FY2027 (estimate) | $88B | $112B | $115B |
| AI semiconductor revenue, FY2028 (estimate) | $92B | $167B | $230B |
| AI semiconductor revenue, FY2030 (estimate) | $62B | $183B | $300B |
| AI semiconductor revenue, FY2036 (estimate) | $78B | $259B | $393B |
| Total revenue, FY2028 (estimate) | $141B | $219B | $285B |
| Total revenue, FY2036 (estimate) | $135B | $330B | $478B |
| Semiconductor segment margin, FY2027 / FY2030 / FY2036 (estimate) | 57% / 44% / 46% | 60% / 55.5% / 54% | 62% / 60.5% / 60% |
| Software segment margin (estimate) | 78%, then 76% | 78% | 80% |
| Stock pay, share of revenue, FY2027 / FY2030 / FY2036 (estimate) | 7.0% / 8.0% / 7.0% | 7.0% / 5.5% / 5.0% | 6.5% / 5.0% / 4.5% |
| Operating margin after stock pay, FY2036 (estimate) | 46.5% | 52.1% | 57.6% |
| Losses on supply and the backstop (estimate) | $26B in year 2, $12B in year 3 | None | None |
| Free cash flow margin after stock pay, FY2036 (estimate) | 36.8% | 41.2% | 46.0% |
| Free cash flow after stock pay, FY2036 (estimate) | $50B | $136B | $220B |
| Discount rate (estimate) | 10.5% | 10.5% | 10.5% |
| Growth after year 10 (estimate) | 2.5% | 3.0% | 3.5% |
| Return a year at $326.08, year-ten value at 10.5% (estimate) | −4.8% | 7.5% | 14.4% |
| Weight (estimate) | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| Value per share (estimate) | $95 | $261 | $431 |
| Versus the price, Q4 2026 (calculated) | −71% | −20% | +32% |
Source 10-Q Q3 FY2026; 10-K FY2025; Q3 FY2026 release; Nasdaq historical; Treasury yields; Damodaran ERP; FRED SP500; Call transcript (Motley Fool) [3][2][4][50][39][43][44][5]. Assumptions and values are my estimates.
Margin bridge, year 3 and year 10, by case
Share of revenue. Stock pay is a cost here, as under GAAP; the amortization of acquired intangibles is left out.
| TTM | Bear, yr 3 | Bear, yr 10 | Base, yr 3 | Base, yr 10 | Bull, yr 3 | Bull, yr 10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI share of revenue | 48% | 59% | 58% | 78% | 78% | 82% | 82% |
| Semiconductor segment margin | 60.7% | 46.0% | 46.0% | 58.0% | 54.0% | 61.0% | 60.0% |
| Software segment margin | 79.9% | 78.0% | 76.0% | 78.0% | 78.0% | 80.0% | 80.0% |
| Segment profit, before stock pay | 67.1% | 54.5% | 54.0% | 60.9% | 57.4% | 63.2% | 62.3% |
| Stock pay | −9.5% | −8.0% | −7.0% | −5.5% | −5.0% | −5.0% | −4.5% |
| Restructuring and other | −0.5% | −0.5% | −0.5% | −0.3% | −0.3% | −0.2% | −0.2% |
| Operating margin after stock pay | 57.0% | 46.0% | 46.5% | 55.1% | 52.1% | 58.0% | 57.6% |
| Tax on that profit | 5.4% | 17.0% | 17.0% | 17.0% | 17.0% | 17.0% | 17.0% |
| Net capital spending | −0.7% | −1.2% | −1.2% | −1.2% | −1.2% | −1.2% | −1.2% |
| Working capital and losses | n/a | −10.0% | −0.6% | −2.3% | −0.9% | −2.7% | −0.6% |
| Owner free cash flow margin | 34.7% | 26.9% | 36.8% | 42.2% | 41.2% | 44.3% | 46.0% |
The TTM column is calculated from the filings; its tax rate is the GAAP effective rate, and its owner free cash flow margin is 34.7%, after $11.0B of working capital and $3.1B of interest, which the cases leave out because they deduct net debt. Year 3 is FY2029; year 10 is FY2036. Source 10-Q Q3 FY2026; 10-Q Q3 FY2025; 10-K FY2025 [3][14][2]. Judgements are my estimates.
The three paths, year by year
US$ billions; fiscal years, so year one is FY2027, the year to 31 October 2027.
| TTM | FY2027 | FY2028 | FY2029 | FY2030 | FY2032 | FY2036 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bear: AI revenue (estimate) | $42.4B | $88B | $92B | $70B | $62B | $67B | $78B |
| Bear: total revenue (estimate) | $89.1B | $137B | $141B | $120B | $112B | $119B | $135B |
| Bear: free cash flow (estimate) | $30.9B | $52B | $32B | $32B | $40B | $44B | $50B |
| Base: AI revenue (estimate) | $42.4B | $112B | $167B | $193B | $183B | $209B | $259B |
| Base: total revenue (estimate) | $89.1B | $162B | $219B | $247B | $240B | $271B | $330B |
| Base: free cash flow (estimate) | $30.9B | $61B | $86B | $105B | $103B | $112B | $136B |
| Bull: AI revenue (estimate) | $42.4B | $115B | $230B | $270B | $300B | $340B | $393B |
| Bull: total revenue (estimate) | $89.1B | $166B | $285B | $328B | $362B | $410B | $478B |
| Bull: free cash flow (estimate) | $30.9B | $65B | $110B | $146B | $162B | $186B | $220B |
TTM figures are calculated from the filings and the quarterly releases; free cash flow is after stock pay. The TTM AI figure includes a fourth quarter implied from the guide's growth rate. Source 10-Q Q3 FY2026; 10-K FY2025; Q3 FY2026 release [3][2][4]. Judgements are my estimates.
AI semiconductor revenue in my three cases
US$ billions a year, fiscal years: bear to bull, with the base case marked.
- Bear to bull range
- Base case
Show the numbers
| Bear | Base | Bull | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2027, outlook $115B (estimate) | 88 | 112 | 115 |
| FY2028, outlook $230B (estimate) | 92 | 167 | 230 |
| FY2030 (estimate) | 62 | 183 | 300 |
| FY2036 (estimate) | 78 | 259 | 393 |
The base case takes most of the outlook and then assumes a normal cycle.
- AI revenue grows 10.5% a quarter for eight quarters from the Q4 guide of $21.7B, to $112B in FY2027, 97% of the outlook, and $167B in FY2028, 73% of it; FY2029 is the Q4 FY2028 run rate of $193B (estimate). Revenue is $162B and $219B, against $165B and $282B on the outlook. The base’s FY2028 depends on the ramp of 2026 continuing at the same rate through the second half of 2027.
- A flat-to-down year in FY2030, AI revenue down 5%, then growth of 7% falling to 5% a year (estimate).
- Other semiconductors grow 4% a year, and software 3% in FY2027, because FY2026 carries unusually large upfront license revenue, then 5% falling to 3.5% (estimate).3
- The semiconductor margin falls from 60% to 54% by FY2033 and stays there, because racks and memory pass through at lower margin. The CFO attributed Q3’s 210 basis point drop in gross margin to AI’s larger share of revenue and guided about two points more for Q4, and the 10-K says rack sales will likely compress it. The FY2018 to FY2025 average of 53.9% is a check, not the reason (estimate). The software margin is 78%, between FY2025’s 76.8% and the TTM’s 79.9%.52317
- Stock pay is 7.0% of revenue in FY2027 and 5.0% from FY2032; there are no losses on supply or the backstop.
The quarters behind the base case and the outlook
AI semiconductor revenue, US$ billions, from the Q4 FY2026 guide of $21.7B. Growth is on the previous quarter.
| Quarter | My base | Growth | The outlook, steady within each year | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 FY2026, the guide (estimate) | $21.7B | +30% | $21.7B | +30% |
| Q1 FY2027 (estimate) | $24.0B | +10.5% | $24.2B | +11.6% |
| Q2 FY2027 (estimate) | $26.5B | +10.5% | $27.0B | +11.6% |
| Q3 FY2027 (estimate) | $29.3B | +10.5% | $30.1B | +11.6% |
| Q4 FY2027 (estimate) | $32.4B | +10.5% | $33.6B | +11.6% |
| Q1 FY2028 (estimate) | $35.7B | +10.5% | $41.2B | +22.7% |
| Q2 FY2028 (estimate) | $39.5B | +10.5% | $50.6B | +22.7% |
| Q3 FY2028 (estimate) | $43.7B | +10.5% | $62.1B | +22.7% |
| Q4 FY2028 (estimate) | $48.2B | +10.5% | $76.1B | +22.7% |
| FY2027 total (estimate) | $112.1B | +95% on FY2026 | $115.0B | +100% on FY2026 |
| FY2028 total (estimate) | $167.1B | +49% on FY2027 | $230.0B | +100% on FY2027 |
The base grows 10.5% a quarter for eight quarters, then holds the Q4 FY2028 run rate of $193B a year in FY2029. The outlook read as steady growth within each year needs 11.6% a quarter in FY2027 and 22.7% in FY2028, and deliveries are lumpy, so the quarters are a yardstick, not a forecast. The base is below the outlook in FY2028 because the outlook needs the quarterly growth rate to double. Source Q3 FY2026 release; Call transcript (Motley Fool) [4][5]. Judgements are my estimates.
The base grows at the same rate in both years. The outlook, read as steady growth within each year, needs 11.6% a quarter in FY2027 and 22.7% in FY2028. The doubling in FY2028 is the ramp I do not take.45
Can the outlook be delivered
Every figure in the outlook comes from the call, in one third-party transcript, and not from a filing: the $115B, the $230B, the earnings above $30, the gigawatt schedule, the 73% accelerator share and the gross margins by segment. This section and the answer treat them as company claims.5 Four tests follow. Gigawatts and supply say the outlook is physically possible. The customers’ budgets say the self-funding customers can carry a quarter of it. The funding of the labs is the risk, and it sets my number.
Gigawatts. The outlook rests on a schedule. An analyst’s tally on the call puts about 10 gigawatts in 2027 and 20 in 2028, with about 15 of the 20 in 2028 at Anthropic and OpenAI. If revenue follows gigawatts, the other four customers carry a quarter of the 2028 outlook, $57.5B. Tan said the gigawatts can be added up and that not all of them will reach production in the two years.5 The tally is for calendar years and the outlook is for fiscal years to 31 October, and chips ship before the gigawatts are energized, so I read the test as a ceiling on what the schedule can carry.
The gigawatts behind the outlook
Management's schedule by customer, and what the outlook implies per gigawatt.
| 2026 | 2027 | 2028 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anthropic (estimate) | 1 GW of Ironwood TPUs | Another 5 GW of TPU v8i; largest XPU customer | An incremental 10 GW |
| OpenAI (estimate) | n/a | Jalapeno, 1.3 GW | Over 5 GW of Jalapeno and its successor |
| Meta (estimate) | n/a | Three MTIA generations by end of 2027 | ‘Line of sight’ to 3 GW through 2028 |
| Google (estimate) | n/a | n/a | Planned TPU deliveries of ‘multi-tens of billions’ a year |
| AI revenue outlook, fiscal year (estimate) | $58B | $115B | $230B |
| Gigawatts if Broadcom’s content is $20B to $30B each (calculated) | About 2 to 3 | About 4 to 6 | About 8 to 12 |
| Gigawatts if the outlook divides over the analyst’s tally of 10 and 20 (calculated) | n/a | 10, at $11.5B each | 20, at $11.5B each |
In the Q&A Tan described Broadcom's content as $20B to $30B a gigawatt and said the 30 GW will not all be in production in the two years. An analyst on the call computed $11B to $12B a gigawatt from the outlook and the schedule. Both are in the reproduction I read; neither is in a filing. Source Call transcript (Motley Fool); Q3 FY2026 release [5][4]. Judgements are my estimates.
At the $20B to $30B of content a gigawatt that Tan described, the $230B outlook needs 7.7 to 11.5 gigawatts in FY2028, 38% to 58% of the 20; my $167B needs 5.6 to 8.4, 28% to 42%. At the $11.5B an analyst got by dividing the outlook by the tally, the outlook needs all 20 and my $167B needs 14.5, 73% of them (calculated).5 On either reading the schedule can carry my base.
Supply. Broadcom has bought supply for the outlook in FY2027 and for about my base case in FY2028: commitments of $52.7B for FY2027 against $49.4B of cost on the outlook, and $73.0B for FY2028 against $72.4B on my base (estimate). The test depends on gross margin. I assume a company gross margin of 70% in FY2027 and 67% in FY2028: the semiconductor margin falls from about 67% in Q3 to 64% and 62% as racks and memory grow, with software at 94%. The Q4 guide for the company is 73%. At 73% the commitments cover the outlook’s FY2028 cost to within $3.2B; at 67% they cover four fifths of it.35 So supply cannot separate my base from the outlook, and I take no write-down in the base because the supply is mostly wafers and memory that carry forward.
Does the supply Broadcom has bought match the revenue?
Unconditional purchase commitments against the cost of goods on each revenue path, US$ billions.
| FY2027 | FY2028 | |
|---|---|---|
| Purchase commitments due in the year (reported) | $52.7B | $73.0B |
| Semiconductor gross margin I assume (about 67% in Q3) (estimate) | 64% | 62% |
| Software gross margin (94% in Q3) (estimate) | 94% | 94% |
| Company gross margin that gives (75% in Q3, 73% guided for Q4) (estimate) | 70% | 67% |
| Cost of goods on the company’s outlook (estimate) | $49.4B | $93.1B |
| Cost of goods on my base case (estimate) | $48.6B | $72.4B |
| Cost of goods on the company’s outlook at a 73% gross margin (estimate) | $44.5B | $76.2B |
| Cost of goods on my base case at a 73% gross margin (estimate) | $43.7B | $59.2B |
| Cost of goods on my bear case (FY2028 at 67%) (estimate) | $41.0B | $46.5B |
Commitments exclude contracts with a remaining term of a year or less (10-Q), so FY2027 is understated. The semiconductor gross margin path is my estimate: management says racks and memory dilute the margin as XPUs grow, and guides the company to about 73% in Q4. The gross margins for Q3 are the CFO's on the call. My bear writes off the FY2028 excess, $73.0B less $46.5B, which is $26.5B. Source 10-Q Q3 FY2026; Call transcript (Motley Fool) [3][5]. Judgements are my estimates.
The customers’ budgets. Alphabet and Meta, the two public XPU customers Broadcom names, spent $129.7B on capital in the first half of 2026, $259B at an annual rate, against operating cash flow of $148.9B. The self-funding customers’ quarter of the FY2028 outlook, $57.5B, is 22% of that rate. The four largest cloud buyers together spent 91% of their operating cash flow, and the $230B outlook equals 39% of their spending at the same rate; my $167B equals 28% (calculated). These are total capital spending, not AI-only, and Microsoft and Amazon are not named customers. Broadcom does not disclose revenue by customer, including Google’s share.455
What the four largest cloud buyers spend
Capital spending and operating cash flow, January to June 2026, US$ billions. These are totals for each company, not AI-only spending.
| Capital spending | Operating cash flow | Spending as a share of cash flow | Relation to Broadcom | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alphabet (calculated) | $80.6B | $84.9B | 95% | Longest-running XPU customer (TPU), about ten years in; new long term agreement in April 202665 |
| Meta Platforms (calculated) | $49.1B | $64.1B | 77% | Named an XPU customer; MTIA production shipments expected in Q45 |
| Microsoft (calculated) | $66.7B | $102.1B | 65% | Not named by Broadcom |
| Amazon (calculated) | $98.4B | $71.4B | 138% | Not named by Broadcom |
| The four together (calculated) | $294.8B | $322.5B | 91% | At twice the half-year, $590B a year |
Microsoft's figures are its March quarter and its June quarter, the second from the 10-K for the year to 30 June 2026 less nine months. Meta's third quarter, in its 10-Q filed 22 October, was $33.9B of spending against $32.8B of operating cash flow. The labs Broadcom names as its largest customers in FY2028, Anthropic and OpenAI, are unlisted, though Anthropic filed an S-1 on 26 October, and Broadcom does not disclose revenue by customer. Source SEC XBRL, big four; Call transcript (Motley Fool); 8-K Google, Anthropic; Anthropic S-1 [45][5][6][53]. Figures calculated from reported data.
Funding. On the call, management said the XPV platform would enable more than 20 gigawatts of compute for OpenAI and Anthropic by the end of 2028, and Tan said the other four of the six XPU customers can fund themselves.5 The 10-Q says the platform bridges the gap between the leading frontier AI labs’ cash flows and their upfront investment, and the 8-K says Anthropic’s use of its expanded capacity is dependent on its continued commercial success.36 Three quarters of the 2028 gigawatts rest on those two customers, whose payment depends on lenders and on their own revenue. OpenAI is private, and no filing I used shows its revenue or cash flow. Anthropic is private too, but its S-1 of 26 October now shows both: $16.3B of revenue and $3.9B of operating cash flow in the first half of 2026. It also shows about $161.2B of rent under leases with Broadcom that neither side can cancel except on a default. Section VII comes back to it.53
My $167B is a judgment, not a derivation. It is the four self-funding customers’ quarter of the outlook at full value, $57.5B, plus 64% of the $172.5B that the two labs carry in the other three quarters (estimate). I would not give the labs’ plan the same weight as a hyperscaler’s own spending. The price already pays for $227B of FY2028 AI revenue, which on this split is 98% of the labs’ share.550
What management said on 2 September, and what the filings hold
The outlook comes from one third-party reproduction of the call, not an official transcript or a filing, so I treat it as a company claim.
| Item | Management | The filings |
|---|---|---|
| AI revenue, FY2026 (calculated) | $58B, up 186%5 | $8.4B, $10.8B and $16.7B reported, $21.7B guided: $57.6B (calculated)4 |
| AI revenue, FY2027 (estimate) | About $115B: ‘secured the supply to again double’; demand exceeds it5 | Purchase commitments due in FY2027 of $52.7B; remaining performance obligations of $179.2B, about 25% within 12 months3 |
| AI revenue, FY2028 (estimate) | $230B, ‘line of sight’, supply secured; $350B over the two years ‘with a pretty high degree of confidence’5 | Purchase commitments due in FY2028 of $73.0B3 |
| Earnings per share, FY2028 (estimate) | ‘Very much on target to exceed $30’; basis not stated5 | Nasdaq’s mean of three estimates is $28.08; its FY2026 mean does not tie to the reported quarters40 |
| Gigawatts (estimate) | About 30 GW across six customers ‘line of sight’; not all in production in the two years5 | XPV platform for more than 20 GW through 2028; first tranche $35B3 |
Management also said it does not intend to update the multi-year AI outlook each quarter. The reproduction says parts of it were created using a language model and carries typos, so I checked each figure I use against its text. A second copy on Investing.com, which blocks scripted download, was read through a summarizing tool and agrees on the outlook figures; I do not cite it. The earnings release holds only the Q3 AI revenue, the Q4 guide of $21.7B and the 66% operating margin. Source Call transcript (Motley Fool); Q3 FY2026 release; 10-Q Q3 FY2026; Nasdaq consensus EPS [5][4][3][40]. Judgements are my estimates.
Bear, bull and stress
The bear case has the funding fail. AI revenue is $88B in FY2027 and $92B in FY2028, then falls 24% to $70B in FY2029, and total revenue falls 15%; the semiconductor margin drops to 46%. Broadcom writes off $26.5B of supply, the excess of FY2028 commitments over the cost of goods on $141B of revenue at a 67% gross margin, and pays $12B under the backstop, 35% of the $35B first tranche, a default with the racks recovered at half the lease amount (estimate).3
The bull case is the outlook delivered. AI revenue is $115B and $230B, then $270B, $300B and $321B, reaching $393B in FY2036, with semiconductor margins of 60% to 62%. Its FY2028 earnings before stock pay are $30.60, which matches the ‘exceed $30’ (estimate).5
The bear still has AI revenue at 1.5 times the TTM’s $42.4B in its worst year. The stress case does not. AI revenue falls to the TTM level, $42B, in FY2029, the semiconductor margin is 46%, the supply write-off is $26.5B and the whole $29B backstop is paid. It is worth $77 a share, −76% against the price (estimate). It has no probability, so it sits outside the weighted value, and that is why the margin-of-safety price comes from the weighted bear.34
A stress case with no probability
AI revenue falls back to the TTM level. It is not in the weighted value and does not set the margin-of-safety price.
| Bear | Stress | |
|---|---|---|
| AI revenue, FY2028 (estimate) | $92B | $92B |
| AI revenue, FY2029 (estimate) | $70B | $42B |
| AI revenue, FY2036 (estimate) | $78B | $47B |
| Semiconductor margin, FY2029 (estimate) | 46% | 46% |
| Supply write-off, FY2028 (estimate) | $26.5B | $26.5B |
| Backstop paid, FY2029 (estimate) | $12B | $29B, in full |
| Value per share (estimate) | $95 | $77 |
| Value against the price (estimate) | −71% | −76% |
| Return a year at the price (estimate) | −4.8% | −7.0% |
| Return a year at the margin-of-safety price (estimate) | 6.6% | 3.9% |
The stress keeps the bear's first two years and the bear's other segments, and takes AI revenue to $42B, the TTM level, in FY2029, growing 2% a year after. Working capital is charged on growth and never released, so the fall in revenue does not return cash. Source 10-Q Q3 FY2026; Call transcript (Motley Fool) [3][5]. Judgements are my estimates.
Weighted 25%, 50% and 25%, the cases give $262 a share (estimate), against a price of $326.08.50 The weights are judgments. I give the bear one chance in four because two of the six XPU customers depend on financing, and the bull one in four because the outlook is management’s own claim and its FY2028 needs the growth rate to double. At 20%, 50% and 30% the weighted value is $279, and at 30%, 50% and 20% it is $245 (estimate). The value after FY2036 is 53% of my base, 48% of the bear and 56% of the bull (calculated).
What it is worth, against the price
Value per share in US dollars. My bear, base and bull cases against the closing price in Q4 2026.
- Bear to bull range
- Base case $261
- Price, Q4 2026 close $326.08
- Margin-of-safety zone below $126
Show the numbers
| Per share | Against the price | |
|---|---|---|
| Bear case (estimate) | $95 | 71% below price |
| Base case (estimate) | $261 | 20% below price |
| Bull case (estimate) | $431 | 32% above price |
| Margin-of-safety price (calculated) | $126 | 61% below price |
| Price, Q4 2026 (reported) | $326.08 |
What closes the gap
Only a higher AI path closes the gap between the price and my base: FY2028 AI revenue of $227B does it alone, and the outlook on time, at $330, sits just above the price. No down year in FY2030, or a semiconductor margin held at 58% or 60%, each close between a fifth and two fifths of the gap, and the discount rate alone moves the base by more: at 9.5% it is $305, still short of the price (estimate).505
From my value to the price, one change at a time
Base-case value per share when one assumption changes; everything else as in the base case. Rates and growth after year ten are in the table above.
| Change | Value | Value against the price |
|---|---|---|
| My base case (estimate) | $261 | −20% |
| AI revenue | ||
| FY2028 AI revenue $140B; FY2029 onward moved by the same percentage (estimate) | $232 | −29% |
| FY2028 AI revenue $200B, same (estimate) | $297 | −9% |
| FY2028 AI revenue of $227B, the figure that makes my base equal the price (estimate) | $326 | 0% |
| FY2028 AI revenue $230B, the outlook, with FY2027 as in my base (estimate) | $329 | +1% |
| The outlook on time: AI revenue of $115B and $230B in FY2027 and FY2028, my growth after (estimate) | $330 | +1% |
| No down year: FY2030 up 5% instead of down 5% (estimate) | $278 | −15% |
| The outlook on time and no down year (estimate) | $353 | +8% |
| Margins and stock pay | ||
| Semiconductor margin held at 58%, FY2025’s level, instead of fading to 54% (estimate) | $276 | −15% |
| Semiconductor margin held at 60% (estimate) | $285 | −13% |
| Stock pay stays at the TTM’s 9.5% of revenue every year (estimate) | $238 | −27% |
| Tax rate 18% instead of 17% in every year (estimate) | $258 | −21% |
| Cost, timing and shares | ||
| Working capital at 8% of each added revenue dollar (estimate) | $267 | −18% |
| Working capital at 38% of each added revenue dollar, the TTM’s rate (estimate) | $253 | −22% |
| Cash flows discounted at mid-year instead of year end (estimate) | $275 | −16% |
| All 165M unvested RSUs counted: 4.94B shares (estimate) | $258 | −21% |
| Shares outstanding, 4.774B, instead of diluted (estimate) | $267 | −18% |
The price is $326.08. Column three is the value divided by the price, less one, so the base is −20% against the price, which is the same gap as the price being 25% above the base. The model leaves out the fourth quarter's cash flow after the dividend, about $2.17 a share. A 10% chance of paying the full $29B backstop would cost $0.59 a share. Source Nasdaq historical; Call transcript (Motley Fool) [50][5]. Judgements are my estimates.
Cash flows are discounted at year end; a mid-year convention adds $14 a share to the base. Two notes on what the model holds. It treats the backstop as free in the base: a 10% chance of paying the full $29B would cost $0.59 a share (estimate).3 It also counts the fourth quarter’s owner free cash flow of $13.7B, less the $3.1B dividend paid on 30 September, in net debt of $26.5B; without it the base would be about $2 lower. The $13.7B is the guided revenue of $34.8B at Q3’s owner free cash flow margin of 39.4%, which is Q3’s free cash flow of $13.7B less $2.0B of stock pay, over $29.6B of revenue (estimate).446
The second backstop. On 27 October Broadcom filed an 8-K for a backstop of up to about $43B, on top of the $29B in the 10-Q if the two are separate; the filing does not say. A 10% chance of paying all $43B would cost $0.88 a share. My signposts list a new backstop as lowering my value, so this one counts against my value. I have not moved the case values: the 8-K gives no payment schedule and no default case, and the base takes no loss on backstops as I stated it.49
The margin of safety
- Price$326.08Close, Q4 2026 [50]
- Base value$261My estimate (estimate)
- Margin of safety below$126set from my bear case (calculated)
I set the margin of safety from the weighted bear case, because one cycle and a handful of customers drive this business. Below $126, 52% under my base value, my bear value of $95 is at least three quarters of the price paid, and my base case would return about 22% a year (estimate). That price is 6.2 times my FY2028 earnings after stock pay. It is also 57% below $293.41, the lowest close of the past year, and 63% below the $338 Broadcom paid on average for its buybacks in the nine months to August, so it describes a crash, not an entry. At $326.08 the stock is priced 25% above my base value and above the weighted value, and there is no margin of safety in the current range. The bear case is built on losses the filings make possible: $126.8B of purchase commitments and a backstop of up to $29B.3150 I do not cut the value again for concentration or the cycle, because both are in the cash flows. The cushion between the bear value and the margin-of-safety price is for what the model does not hold, such as a Taiwan supply shock or the loss of Hock Tan, and for my own error. The price sits 159% above the margin-of-safety price.
The next best use of the same dollar is NVIDIA, the closest comparable here. On its page my base returns 9.7% a year, against 7.5% here, and its price is 5% above my base value, against 25% here.64 A business that turns 44% of revenue into free cash flow is one question. Paying $326.08, 25% above my base, is another. The price needs four things at once: the labs pay, 60%; the self-funding four keep spending, 80%; no customer moves its next chip in-house, 80%; the margin holds near 66%, 80%. That multiplies to 31% (estimate). They are guesses and overlap, so I read it as near the 25% I give the bull.
What the price buys in each case
Value against the price, and the yearly return my cash flows give at that price.
| At a price of | Bear value against the price | Base value against the price | Bull value against the price | Stress value, no weight, against the price | Return a year: bear, base, bull, stress |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $326.08, the close in Q4 2026 (estimate) | −71% | −20% | +32% | −76% | −4.8%, 7.5%, 14.4%, −7.0% |
| $293.41, the lowest close of the past year (estimate) | −68% | −11% | +47% | −74% | −3.6%, 8.9%, 16.0%, −5.9% |
| $126, the margin-of-safety price (estimate) | −25% | +107% | +242% | −39% | 6.6%, 21.8%, 30.3%, 3.9% |
Value against the price is the case value divided by the price, less one. The return is the rate that equates the price, with net debt, to ten years of the case's cash flow plus a year-ten value at 10.5%, so a case worth less than the price returns less than 10.5%. The margin-of-safety price is 6.2 times my FY2028 earnings after stock pay and 7.2 times the FY2027 consensus. Source Nasdaq historical [50]. Judgements are my estimates.
Where this could be in 5 and 10 years
These are the value of my model at later dates. Value in a year is the present value, at 10.5% and in that year’s dollars, of the owner cash that comes after it, per today’s share count, less today’s net debt of $26.5B. Owner cash is free cash flow after stock pay, all counted as paid out. Years are fiscal, to the Sunday nearest 31 October.
Value per share in year 5 and year 10
Value is mine and in each year’s dollars. The return is the yearly rate from the $326.08 close in Q4 2026 to the year-ten value, with the owner cash paid out on the way.
| Case | Value per share, to October 2031 | Value per share, to October 2036 | Owner cash paid out per share, to October 2036 | Return a year from $326.08 to October 2036 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bear (estimate) | $110 | $126 | $89 | −4.8% |
| Base (estimate) | $320 | $377 | $221 | 7.5% |
| Bull (estimate) | $553 | $660 | $342 | 14.4% |
Source My model, years FY2027 to FY2036. Values and returns are my estimates.
For the base to hold at 5 years, AI revenue has to reach about $183B in FY2030 after one down year, with free cash flow near $103B, and the business has to be growing 5% to 7% from there. That is worth $320 then. At 10 years it is $377 if free cash flow reaches $136B, a 41% margin, with semiconductor margins at 54% and 3% growth after. Value rises less than 10.5% a year because the cash paid out on the way is counted separately. The base returns 7.5% a year from today’s price, below the 10.5% I require (estimate).
The bear and the bull differ on four numbers: AI revenue, the semiconductor margin, the capital the build-out ties up, and the discount rate. In the bear, the build-out stalls in FY2028, I write off $26.5B of supply, margins drop to 46% and free cash flow reaches $50B. In the bull, the outlook arrives on time at $115B and $230B, margins hold near 60%, and free cash flow reaches $220B. One point on the discount rate moves the base by 13% to 17%.
The most likely way the base is wrong is FY2028. It needs $167B of AI revenue, and the ramp of 2026 has to keep its pace through 2027. At $140B, the base is worth $232 today.
A reader’s guide: these are estimates of value, not forecasts of the share price. The market price can sit above or below value for years.
The case for the price
What most people miss
Anthropic filed to go public on 26 October, and its S-1 gives my funding test its first lab accounts. Anthropic has five-year equipment leases with Broadcom, with rent of about $161.2B before interest. Neither side can cancel except on a default, and Anthropic itself guarantees them. It may also issue Broadcom up to $42B of notes to pay part of that rent, which matches the unnamed customer in Broadcom’s 10-Q. It had $131.7B of cash and short-term investments at 30 June, and it earned $1.0B of operating income on $11.6B of revenue in the second quarter.53
From Q3 last year to Q3 this year, semiconductor revenue rose $11.7B and the segment’s research spending rose $156M. Segment profit rose $7.6B, so each added dollar earned 65 cents (calculated), above the 61.3% average.3 Racks are supposed to dilute that margin. So far it has risen, though the segment’s gross margin slipped from 67.4% to 66.9%. My base fades it to 54%.
Alphabet’s inventory went from $2.4B to $13.3B in nine months, mostly TPU systems and devices. Thomas Kurian, who runs Google Cloud, says all the TPU inventory sits against signed contracts.5455
The bull case
Hock Tan makes it best. On 2 September he said Broadcom has secured the supply for about $115B of AI revenue in FY2027 and $230B in FY2028, and that FY2027 demand is higher. He said a custom chip costs less than half a GPU for the same work, and that each gigawatt could earn a lab $30B a year, so helping them pay makes sense.5 These are company claims.
JPMorgan’s Harlan Sur had a $580 target in June. Press reports have JPMorgan saying the Google deal “locks in Broadcom’s TPU design win roadmap” through v11, and that FY2028 AI revenue could approach $300B. That was before the September outlook.5658 Investing.com reports Bernstein raised its target to $575 on 3 September.57 On 27 October DA Davidson’s Gil Luria raised his rating and took his target to $400. CNBC quotes his note: he expects Anthropic to raise its capital and OpenAI to follow, and says “AVGO is trading as if the chances of that happening are near zero.”59 ARK’s 13F listed 407,202 shares at 30 June, about 1% of the portfolio, from none at the end of 2025. Three of its ETFs held 353,706 at 31 July, 1.2% to 2.3% of each fund.6061
Against reality
If Broadcom delivers $115B and $230B at my base margins, and the labs pay, the price is possible. That path is worth $330 a share, and $227B in FY2028 alone gets to $326.08 (estimate).550
Today is a long way off. The Q4 guide runs at $87B a year, so $227B is 2.6 times that pace (calculated).4 FY2027 needs 11.6% growth a quarter, which looks easy after 29% to 55% this fiscal year, counting the Q4 guide (calculated).42526 FY2028 needs 22.7% a quarter on far larger numbers (estimate).
Funding is the other gap. The price pays for 98% of the $172.5B I give the two labs in FY2028, where my base takes 64% (estimate). Anthropic’s rent averages about $32B a year, about 70% of its Q2 revenue annualized (calculated), and the S-1 leaves its total compute commitments blank.53 Rent is also not Broadcom’s revenue: Broadcom has assigned part of the leases and intends to assign more. I found no public accounts for OpenAI. The self-funding side looks better: Alphabet and Meta spent $85.3B on capital in Q3, $341B a year against the $259B in my test, though both spent more than their operating cash flow (calculated).5445
What they have to hit
Six numbers. Five come out on a fixed schedule. Anthropic’s comes with S-1 amendments until it lists, then quarterly. The thresholds are the ones this price needs, and they agree with my signposts below.
| Indicator | Today | What the case needs | Where to track it | Next check |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI semiconductor revenue | $16.7B in Q3; $21.7B guided for Q44 | Q4 at or above the guide, a Q1 FY2027 guide near $24.2B, $115B in FY2027 and $227B in FY2028 (estimate) | Quarterly earnings release, 8-K Exhibit 99.1: the AI semiconductor revenue sentence and the next-quarter guide | Q4 report, 9 December 2026 |
| Contracted revenue due in 12 months | $179.2B in total, about 25% or $45B due within 12 months (calculated)3 | Higher at every report, and about $88B by the FY2027 10-K: today’s 39% cover of $115B, applied to $227B (estimate) | 10-Q, Note 2, Remaining Performance Obligations; the revenue note in the 10-K | FY2026 10-K, expected mid-December 2026 |
| Margins | Semiconductor segment 61.3% in Q3; company operating margin 67.9%, about 66% guided34 | Segment at 60% in FY2027 and 58% in FY2029, above 55% through FY2030; company about 64% in FY2028 for earnings above $30 (estimate) | Segment: 10-Q, Note 9, Segment Information, or the 10-K segment note. Company: earnings release, non-GAAP operating income line | Company: Q4 report, 9 December 2026. Segment: FY2026 10-K, expected mid-December 2026 |
| Backstops and notes | Backstops of up to $29B and about $43B; nothing paid on the first at 2 August; $42B of Anthropic notes, none issued34953 | No payment under either backstop and no note issued. Any new backstop counts against my value | 10-Q, Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies, or the same note in the 10-K; Broadcom 8-Ks on EDGAR (opens in a new tab), Item 2.03 | FY2026 10-K, expected mid-December 2026 |
| Anthropic’s ability to pay | Q2 revenue $11.6B; operating income $1.0B; cash and short-term investments $131.7B53 | Rent of about $32B a year once the racks run, paid without the notes (estimate) | Anthropic filings on EDGAR (opens in a new tab): S-1, Infrastructure Equipment Leases and Liquidity sections, then 10-Qs after listing | Next S-1 amendment; date not set |
| Alphabet and Meta capital spending | $85.3B in Q3: Alphabet $51.4B, Meta $33.9B (calculated)5445 | At least $259B a year, about $65B a quarter, and the rise in 2027 that Alphabet expects55 | Each 10-Q and 10-K, cash flow statement, Purchases of property and equipment; Alphabet’s Q4 call for 2027 | Q4 reports, expected late January to early February 2027 |
Today values are the latest published. Alphabet’s Q3 is its nine months less the first half. The Q1 FY2027 figure is the outlook read as steady growth, and Broadcom’s obligations cover software as well as chips, so 39% is a yardstick. The 10-Q warns they are not indicative of future revenue. Source Q3 FY2026 release; 10-Q Q3 FY2026; 8-K of 27 October; Anthropic S-1; Alphabet 10-Q; SEC XBRL, big four [4][3][49][53][54][45]. Judgements are my estimates.
Where I come down
Anthropic’s filing moved me: part of my doubt about the labs is now a signed lease and real accounts. It did not move my $95, $261 and $431, because a lease pays only if the tenant can, OpenAI is still a blank, and the 27 October backstop puts more of Broadcom’s balance sheet behind its customers. I would raise my values if Q4 meets the guide, the $115B stands on 9 December, and more of the labs’ share shows up in filed contracts; at $200B of FY2028 AI revenue my base would be $297 (estimate).
Risks, and what would change my view
- The labs’ funding. Two of the six XPU customers rely on the XPV platform, and Broadcom’s backstop of up to about $29B is my bear case’s trigger; on 27 October it filed a second, of up to about $43B (see Valuation).3495
- Concentration. One distributor was 50% of Q3 revenue and the top five end customers about 55%.3
- Customers’ own silicon. The 10-Q names customer-owned tooling, and Google works with MediaTek on TPU v8 (see The moat).3275
- Supply. TSMC made about 95% of the wafers, and Broadcom has $126.8B of purchase commitments.23
- Margin. Gross margin is guided down as racks and memory grow; operating margin guided at about 66% is the line I watch.45
- Tax and stock pay. The 5.4% tax rate is expected to rise, and vested stock was worth three times its expense (see Financials).23
- The CEO. Tan is 74, has no employment contract and no named successor, and the CFO changed in June.21033
- Software. Regulatory inquiries in Korea, Japan and the European Union, and churn evidence that comes only from a rival-sponsored survey.2328
- Geography. China including Hong Kong was 17% of FY2025 revenue by delivery location, and TSMC is in Taiwan.2
What would change my view
The figures I will check each quarter, today's reading, and the thresholds.
| Signal | Today | Raises my value | Lowers my value |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI semiconductor revenue | $16.7B in Q3, up 221%; $21.7B guided for Q44 | Q4 at or above the guide and the $115B FY2027 outlook kept at the report Broadcom plans for 9 December5 | Q4 below the guide, or the FY2027 outlook cut |
| Remaining performance obligations | $179.2B, 25% within 12 months3 | Higher, with more due within 12 months | Lower without matching revenue |
| Purchase commitments and inventory | $126.8B committed; inventory $4.5B, from $2.3B3 | Commitments flat while obligations rise | Inventory above $8B, or commitments rising faster than obligations |
| Backstop and customer notes | Backstop up to $29B, and a second of up to about $43B filed on 27 October, which is the new backstop this signpost watches for; notes up to $42B, none issued349 | No new backstop | A new backstop, any note issued, or any payment under the backstop |
| Top five end customers | 55% of Q3 revenue, 50% over nine months3 | Below 50% as the sixth customer ramps | Above 60%, or the loss of one |
| Gross and operating margin | Non-GAAP gross margin 75% in Q3, about 73% guided for Q4; operating margin 67.9% in Q3, about 66% guided45 | Operating margin holds at 66% | Operating margin below 62% |
| Semiconductor segment margin | 61.3% in Q33 | Above 60% | Below 55% |
| Software | Revenue $8.75B in Q3 including $3.47B of upfront license; contract assets $11.9B3 | Contract assets flat | Contract assets above $15B |
| Debt and share count | Principal $61.1B; 4.887B diluted shares3 | Principal below $55B by FY2027 | Principal above $70B, or diluted shares above 5.0B |
| The CEO | 74; no successor named; awards run to FY20301031 | A named successor and a handover plan | A departure without one |
Source Q3 FY2026 release; 10-Q Q3 FY2026; Call transcript (Motley Fool); 10-K FY2025; Proxy 2026 [4][3][5][2][10]. Judgements are my estimates.
What would raise my base value: the report Broadcom plans to give after the close on 9 December holding the $115B FY2027 outlook with the Q4 AI revenue at or above $21.7B, remaining performance obligations rising with more due inside twelve months, and the top five customers falling below half of revenue. What would lower it: any new backstop, which the 8-K of 27 October already is, or note issuance, inventory above $8B, an operating margin below 62%, or a Q4 AI figure under the guide.435
Sources
- 1AVGO daily closes, Nasdaq.com historical API, 24 October 2016 to 23 October 2026 (opens in a new tab)
- 2Broadcom Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 2 November 2025 (opens in a new tab)
- 3Broadcom Form 10-Q, quarter ended 2 August 2026 (opens in a new tab)
- 4Broadcom Q3 fiscal 2026 earnings release (Form 8-K, Exhibit 99.1) (opens in a new tab)
- 5Broadcom Q3 fiscal 2026 earnings call transcript (third-party reproduction), 2 September 2026 (opens in a new tab)
- 6Broadcom Form 8-K, Item 8.01: Google long term agreement and Anthropic expansion (opens in a new tab)
- 7Marvell Technology Form 10-Q, quarter ended 1 August 2026 (opens in a new tab)
- 8NVIDIA Form 10-Q, quarter ended 26 July 2026 (opens in a new tab)
- 9AMD Q2 2026 results (Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K) (opens in a new tab)
- 10Broadcom 2026 proxy statement (DEF 14A) (opens in a new tab)
- 11Hock E. Tan, Forms 4 filed 2024 to 2026 (SEC ownership listing, reporting owner CIK 0001211588) (opens in a new tab)
- 12Broadcom Limited Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 30 October 2016 (opens in a new tab)
- 13Broadcom Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 3 November 2024 (opens in a new tab)
- 14Broadcom Form 10-Q, quarter ended 3 August 2025 (opens in a new tab)
- 15Broadcom Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 4 November 2018 (opens in a new tab)
- 16Broadcom Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 3 November 2019 (opens in a new tab)
- 17Broadcom Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 1 November 2020 (opens in a new tab)
- 18Broadcom Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 29 October 2023 (opens in a new tab)
- 19Broadcom Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 30 October 2022 (opens in a new tab)
- 20Broadcom Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 31 October 2021 (opens in a new tab)
- 21SEC XBRL companyfacts, Broadcom Inc. (CIK 0001730168) (opens in a new tab)
- 22Broadcom Form 8-K, Item 8.01: Apple agreements (opens in a new tab)
- 23Dell'Oro Group: Ethernet extends lead in AI scale-out networks despite strong InfiniBand rebound (opens in a new tab)
- 24Broadcom Q4 and fiscal 2025 earnings release (Form 8-K, Exhibit 99.1) (opens in a new tab)
- 25Broadcom Q1 fiscal 2026 earnings release (Form 8-K, Exhibit 99.1) (opens in a new tab)
- 26Broadcom Q2 fiscal 2026 earnings release (Form 8-K, Exhibit 99.1) (opens in a new tab)
- 27Counterpoint Research: AI Server Compute ASIC Shipments to Triple by 2027 as Custom Silicon Enters Hyper-Growth Phase (opens in a new tab)
- 28The Register: Nine in 10 VMware customers eye the exit as licensing bills bite (Unisphere Research survey for Rimini Street) (opens in a new tab)
- 29Broadcom 2025 proxy statement (DEF 14A) (opens in a new tab)
- 30Broadcom Inc. insider transactions, SEC ownership listing for issuer CIK 0001730168 (opens in a new tab)
- 31Broadcom Form 8-K, Item 5.02: 2025 Tan PSU Award (opens in a new tab)
- 32Broadcom Form 8-K, Item 5.02: October 2022 Tan and Kawwas PSU awards (opens in a new tab)
- 33Broadcom Form 8-K, Item 5.02: CFO transition (opens in a new tab)
- 34Broadcom 2024 annual meeting results (Form 8-K, Item 5.07) (opens in a new tab)
- 35Broadcom 2026 annual meeting results (Form 8-K, Item 5.07) (opens in a new tab)
- 36Broadcom Form 8-K, Item 5.02: Hartenstein retirement from the board (opens in a new tab)
- 37Broadcom press release on tender offer results (Form 8-K, Exhibit 99.2) (opens in a new tab)
- 38Broadcom Limited Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 29 October 2017 (opens in a new tab)
- 39US Treasury daily par yield curve rates, 2026 (opens in a new tab)
- 40AVGO consensus EPS forecasts, Nasdaq.com analyst API (opens in a new tab)
- 41Consensus EPS forecasts for NVIDIA, AMD and Marvell, Nasdaq.com analyst API (opens in a new tab)
- 42NVDA (opens in a new tab), AMD (opens in a new tab) and MRVL (opens in a new tab) daily quotes, close on 23 October 2026, Nasdaq.com historical API
- 43Damodaran implied equity risk premium, 1 October 2026 (opens in a new tab)
- 44S&P 500 index daily close, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (FRED series SP500) (opens in a new tab)
- 45SEC XBRL company concepts. Capital spending: Microsoft capital spending (opens in a new tab), Alphabet capital spending (opens in a new tab), Amazon capital spending (opens in a new tab) and Meta capital spending (opens in a new tab). Operating cash flow: Microsoft operating cash flow (opens in a new tab), Alphabet operating cash flow (opens in a new tab), Amazon operating cash flow (opens in a new tab) and Meta operating cash flow (opens in a new tab) (10-Q and 10-K values)
- 46Broadcom Form 8-K, Item 2.02: Q3 fiscal 2026 results and dividend declaration (opens in a new tab)
- 47AVGO daily quotes, close on 29 October 2026, Nasdaq.com historical API (opens in a new tab)
- 48NVDA (opens in a new tab), AMD (opens in a new tab) and MRVL (opens in a new tab) daily quotes, close on 29 October 2026, Nasdaq.com historical API
- 49Broadcom Form 8-K, event of 26 October 2026, Item 2.03 (opens in a new tab)
- 50AVGO quote, close on 30 October 2026, Nasdaq.com quote API (opens in a new tab)
- 51NVDA (opens in a new tab), AMD (opens in a new tab) and MRVL (opens in a new tab) quotes, close on 30 October 2026, Nasdaq.com quote API
- 52Nasdaq Composite (opens in a new tab) and PHLX Semiconductor index (opens in a new tab) quotes, 30 October 2026, Nasdaq.com quote API
- 53Anthropic, PBC Form S-1 (opens in a new tab)
- 54Alphabet Form 10-Q, quarter ended 30 September 2026 (opens in a new tab)
- 55Alphabet Q3 2026 earnings call transcript (third-party reproduction), 28 October 2026 (opens in a new tab)
- 56JPMorgan Stands Behind AVGO Stock With $580 Target After Sell-Off (opens in a new tab)
- 57Bernstein raises Broadcom stock price target to $575 on AI growth (opens in a new tab)
- 58JPMorgan raises Broadcom stock price target to $580 on AI demand (opens in a new tab)
- 59Wall Street sees this chip stock as the big winner from the Anthropic IPO (opens in a new tab)
- 60ARK Investment Management Form 13F, quarter ended 30 June 2026 (opens in a new tab)
- 61ARK Innovation ETF Form N-PORT (opens in a new tab), ARK Next Generation Internet ETF Form N-PORT (opens in a new tab) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF Form N-PORT (opens in a new tab), 31 July 2026
- 62Meta Platforms Form 8-K, Item 5.02 (opens in a new tab)
- 63Meta Platforms Form 8-K, Item 5.07 (opens in a new tab)
- 64NVIDIA, on this site: base case return and price against base value (opens in a new tab)
How the figures are labelled
(reported)Reported: taken from a filing or a price feed, as printed.
(calculated)Calculated: arithmetic on reported figures, such as a margin or a growth rate.
(estimate)Estimate: my judgement, such as a case value or a growth assumption.
The price
Close in Q4 2026: $326.08, from Nasdaq [50]. Retrieved in Q4 2026.
Fiscal years end on the Sunday closest to 31 October and run 52 or 53 weeks: FY2025 ended 2 November 2025 (52 weeks), FY2024 (3 November 2024) and FY2018 (4 November 2018) had 53. FY2026 ends 1 November 2026 and Broadcom plans to report on 9 December[5], after the price date, so TTM is the four quarters to 2 August 2026. Per-share values before FY2022 are adjusted for the 10-for-1 split of 12 July 2024. FY2016 includes Broadcom Corporation from 1 February 2016, FY2019 includes CA from 5 November 2018 and FY2024 includes VMware from 22 November 2023.
The valuation
Ten-year discounted cash flow on owner free cash flow, which is after stock-based pay and before the non-cash amortization of acquired intangibles. Each year is built from AI, other semiconductor and software revenue, segment margins, stock pay, a 17% tax rate, capital spending and working capital, at a 10.5% discount rate, then growth in perpetuity. Years are Broadcom's fiscal years, FY2027 to FY2036, valued at the start of FY2027, about 1 November 2026, and each year's cash flow is discounted at the end of the year; a mid-year convention would add about $14 a share to the base. Working capital is charged at 20% of each added revenue dollar and never released when revenue falls. Net debt is the 2 August 2026 balance less my estimate of the fourth quarter's owner free cash flow after the 30 September dividend; guarantees and purchase commitments are not deducted. Per-share values divide by 4.887B diluted shares. The yearly returns on this page are the rate that equates the price, with net debt, to ten years of each case's cash flow plus a year-ten value taken at the 10.5% discount rate.
The margin-of-safety price is $126, set from my bear case. No rating: the page states a range and the price, and leaves the decision to the reader.
Research, not investment advice. Figures as of .
Legal information and disclosures
These are my own views as of the update shown on this page. They can change without notice, and I have no duty to update them. Past performance does not indicate future results, and any investment can lose money.
This is for education only. It is not investment, legal, tax or accounting advice, and it is not an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security in any jurisdiction. It does not consider your goals or circumstances.
Figures from company filings and other third parties are believed to be reliable, but I have not independently verified them and cannot guarantee them. Bear, base and bull values, and anything marked as an estimate, are my own and rest on assumptions that may prove wrong.
Please do not copy or republish this material without my written consent.